Within parent city
83
th percentile
High
Census Tract · Ranked #47,371 of 84,120 nationally
Fortuna Foothills Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 04027011123 · Yuma, AZ · pop 1,249 · 90% of tract blocks fall in Fortuna Foothills
Census tract 04027011123 covers part of Fortuna Foothills, AZ, and scores 4.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 1,249. Severe burden reaches 56%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8%
Stable renters 6%
Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units685
Renter share14.3%
SVI overall0.81
Poverty rate17.9%
Median income$52,042
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
71
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
66
th percentile
Elevated
National
44
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Fortuna Foothills and the region
Centroid at 32.6388, -114.4523 · click any tract to drill in
Why Fortuna Foothills scores 4.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Fortuna Foothills
5.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.7
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
17.9% poverty · this tract
4.5
Supply constraint
$686 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fortuna Foothills
8.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fortuna Foothills
4.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fortuna Foothills
7.0
How Fortuna Foothills compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 81
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 91%Socioeconomic
- 72%Household composition
- 50%Racial/ethnic minority
- 59%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 13.1%Housing insecurity
- 8.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 19.1%Food insecurity
- 15.5%SNAP enrollment
- 9.2%Transit barriers
- 17.0%No health insurance
- 14.6%Frequent mental distress
- 39.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Fortuna Foothills
Cost burden runs 56% here against 40.1% across Yuma County. At $686 a month, rents run 40% under what the rest of Fortuna Foothills commands.
The main counterweight is supply constraint at 1/10. Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.1/10.
Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 2.2/10. Nationally it ranks #47,371 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Only 14% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 8.3/10.
Rent consumes only 16% of average household income of $52,042, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured. It tracks the Yuma County average of 3.8 closely.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 04027011123
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04027011123?
Census tract 04027011123 in Fortuna Foothills scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 04027011123?
Median gross rent is $686/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 56% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 04027011123?
17.9% of residents in tract 04027011123 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,249.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 04027011123?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 81th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 91th, household 72th, minority 50th, housing 59th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 04027011123 struggle to pay rent?
About 13.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 04027011123 compare to Fortuna Foothills overall?
Tract 04027011123 scores 4.1/10, higher than the parent city of Fortuna Foothills at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fortuna Foothills eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Fortuna Foothills
Top eight tracts in Fortuna Foothills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · AZ
Los Amigos
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AZ
The Foothills
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AZ
Arroyo del Fortuna
4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AZ
Los Amigos
3.8
/ 10 · Low
Tract · AZ
04027010910
3.7
/ 10 · Low
Tract · AZ
Arroyo del Fortuna
3.6
/ 10 · Low
Tract · AZ
Oasis Del Este
3.5
/ 10 · Low
Tract · AZ
Yuma East
3.2
/ 10 · Low
Related