Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #42,763 of 84,120 nationally

Fortuna Foothills Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 04027010910 · Yuma, AZ · pop 1,553 · 87% of tract blocks fall in Fortuna Foothills

Eviction risk in Fortuna Foothills eviction risk centers on tract 04027010910, which scores $1/10 (Moderate tier) and is home to 1,553 residents. That is riskier than roughly 40% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 39% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 16% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,559 monthly, set against $56,667 in average yearly household income, roughly 33% of income at the averages. Renters make up 19% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 12% Owners 81%
Tract context
Occupied units894
Renter share19.2%
SVI overall0.55
Poverty rate13.8%
Median income$56,667

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
58 th percentile
Rank, 58th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 13 tracts In Fortuna Foothills
Elevated
Within county
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#53 of 67 tracts In Yuma
Low
Within state
59 th percentile
Rank, 59th percentileLowHigh
#733 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
Elevated
National
49 th percentile
Rank, 49th percentileLowHigh
#42,763 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Fortuna Foothills and the region

Centroid at 32.7039, -114.3908 · click any tract to drill in

Why Fortuna Foothills scores 3.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fortuna Foothills
5.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.7
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
13.8% poverty · this tract
3.5
Supply constraint
$1,559 rent vs county FMR
6.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fortuna Foothills
8.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fortuna Foothills
4.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fortuna Foothills
7.0

How Fortuna Foothills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Fortuna Foothills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.93.9This tracttract 010910Fortuna Foothills: 3.03.0Fortuna Foothillsparent cityCounty: 4.74.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 55

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Fortuna Foothills

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 8.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Fortuna Foothills eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Yuma County average of 4.3 and in line with the Arizona statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 6.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 55th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 04027010910

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04027010910?

Census tract 04027010910 in Fortuna Foothills scores 3.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 04027010910?

Median gross rent is $1,559/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 39% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 04027010910?

13.8% of residents in tract 04027010910 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,553.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 04027010910?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 55th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 59th, household 62th, minority 31th, housing 46th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 04027010910 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 04027010910 compare to Fortuna Foothills overall?

Tract 04027010910 scores 3.9/10, higher than the parent city of Fortuna Foothills at 3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fortuna Foothills eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Fortuna Foothills

Top eight tracts in Fortuna Foothills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related