Fortuna Foothills Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 04027010910 · Yuma, AZ · pop 1,553 · 87% of tract blocks fall in Fortuna Foothills
With a score of 3.7/10, tract 04027010910 in Fortuna Foothills, AZ reads lower for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 1,553 residents. At $1,559 a month, rents run 37% over what the rest of Fortuna Foothills commands.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Fortuna Foothills and the region
Centroid at 32.7039, -114.3908 · click any tract to drill in
Why Fortuna Foothills scores 3.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Fortuna Foothills compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 55
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 59%Socioeconomic
- 62%Household composition
- 31%Racial/ethnic minority
- 46%Housing & transportation
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.5%Housing insecurity
- 4.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.5%Food insecurity
- 8.5%SNAP enrollment
- 5.5%Transit barriers
- 9.5%No health insurance
- 11.3%Frequent mental distress
- 39.9%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Fortuna Foothills
Annualized rent equals 33% of average household income of $56,667, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 8.1/10.
The severe-burden share is 16%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Running cool, state political climate reads 2.2/10.
On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 2.4/10. Housing insecurity runs 6.5% against 14.2% nationally.
Food insecurity runs 10.5% against 17.8% nationally. The voucher gap is 13.2%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
Nationally it ranks #54,273 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Only 19% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.9/10. 39% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 04027010910
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04027010910?
What is the average rent in tract 04027010910?
What is the poverty rate in tract 04027010910?
How socially vulnerable is tract 04027010910?
What share of households in tract 04027010910 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 04027010910 compare to Fortuna Foothills overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Fortuna Foothills
Top eight tracts in Fortuna Foothills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.