Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #54,273 of 84,120 nationally

Fortuna Foothills Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 04027010910 · Yuma, AZ · pop 1,553 · 87% of tract blocks fall in Fortuna Foothills

With a score of 3.7/10, tract 04027010910 in Fortuna Foothills, AZ reads lower for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 1,553 residents. At $1,559 a month, rents run 37% over what the rest of Fortuna Foothills commands.

Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 12% Owners 81%
Tract context
Occupied units894
Renter share19.2%
SVI overall0.55
Poverty rate13.8%
Median income$56,667

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
58 th percentile
Rank, 58th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 13 tracts In Fortuna Foothills
Elevated
Within county
56 th percentile
Rank, 56th percentileLowHigh
#30 of 67 tracts In Yuma
Elevated
Within state
57 th percentile
Rank, 57th percentileLowHigh
#756 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
Elevated
National
36 th percentile
Rank, 36th percentileLowHigh
#54,273 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Fortuna Foothills and the region

Centroid at 32.7039, -114.3908 · click any tract to drill in

Why Fortuna Foothills scores 3.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fortuna Foothills
5.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.7
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
13.8% poverty · this tract
3.5
Supply constraint
$1,559 rent vs county FMR
6.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fortuna Foothills
8.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fortuna Foothills
4.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fortuna Foothills
7.0

How Fortuna Foothills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Fortuna Foothills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.73.7This tracttract 010910Fortuna Foothills: 3.73.7Fortuna Foothillsparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 55

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Fortuna Foothills

Annualized rent equals 33% of average household income of $56,667, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 8.1/10.

The severe-burden share is 16%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Running cool, state political climate reads 2.2/10.

On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 2.4/10. Housing insecurity runs 6.5% against 14.2% nationally.

Food insecurity runs 10.5% against 17.8% nationally. The voucher gap is 13.2%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

Nationally it ranks #54,273 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Only 19% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.9/10. 39% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 04027010910

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04027010910?

Census tract 04027010910 in Fortuna Foothills scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 04027010910?

Median gross rent is $1,559/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 39% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 04027010910?

13.8% of residents in tract 04027010910 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,553.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 04027010910?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 55th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 59th, household 62th, minority 31th, housing 46th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 04027010910 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 04027010910 compare to Fortuna Foothills overall?

Tract 04027010910 scores 3.7/10, right in line with the parent city of Fortuna Foothills at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fortuna Foothills eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Fortuna Foothills

Top eight tracts in Fortuna Foothills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related