Silver Triangle Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037143602 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,734 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
With a score of 9.3/10, tract 06037143602 in the Silver Triangle area of Los Angeles, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.1450, -118.3855 · click any tract to drill in
Why Silver Triangle scores 9.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Silver Triangle compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 55
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 56%Socioeconomic
- 12%Household composition
- 47%Racial/ethnic minority
- 84%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 36%Grade B
- 17%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Silver Triangle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.7%Housing insecurity
- 4.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.8%Food insecurity
- 8.3%SNAP enrollment
- 5.5%Transit barriers
- 4.0%No health insurance
- 15.1%Frequent mental distress
- 24.4%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Silver Triangle
Running hot, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. 21% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Food insecurity runs 8.8% against 17.8% nationally. Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.9 points. Adults with no health insurance runs 4.0% against 11.3% nationally.
This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. Nationally it ranks #3,082 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Social vulnerability reads 6/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.8 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 06037143602
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037143602?
What is the average rent in tract 06037143602?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037143602?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037143602?
Is tract 06037143602 considered part of Silver Triangle?
What share of households in tract 06037143602 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037143602 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037143602 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.