Silver Triangle Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037143801 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,411 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
06037143801 is a census tract in the Silver Triangle area of Los Angeles, CA. It scores 8.4/10 for landlords. Population here is 3,411. Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, around a third of renters here are cost-burdened.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.1369, -118.3858 · click any tract to drill in
Why Silver Triangle scores 8.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Silver Triangle compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 7
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 17%Socioeconomic
- 4%Household composition
- 54%Racial/ethnic minority
- 13%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 68%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Silver Triangle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.8%Housing insecurity
- 3.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.6%Food insecurity
- 6.9%SNAP enrollment
- 4.9%Transit barriers
- 3.7%No health insurance
- 14.4%Frequent mental distress
- 22.2%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Silver Triangle
The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. Average gross rent is $2,837, 47% above the Los Angeles average. Running hot, local political climate reads 9.5/10.
Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. 12% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
SNAP participation runs 6.9% against 15.2% nationally. Adults with no health insurance runs 3.7% against 11.3% nationally. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
That is riskier than roughly 93% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.6/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 0.9 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 06037143801
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037143801?
What is the average rent in tract 06037143801?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037143801?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037143801?
Is tract 06037143801 considered part of Silver Triangle?
What share of households in tract 06037143801 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037143801 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037143801 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.