Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #3,529 of 84,120 nationally

South San Gabriel Eviction Risk: High , Rosemead

Tract 06037482502 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,519 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

With a score of 9.2/10, tract 06037482502 in the South San Gabriel area of Rosemead, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,519. What pushes it up most is tenant-organizing strength at 9.3/10.

Risk score
9.2
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 28% Stable renters 28% Owners 44%
Tract context
Occupied units836
Renter share56.1%
SVI overall0.72
Poverty rate21.8%
Median income$73,125

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 13 tracts In South San Gabriel
High
Within parent city
79 th percentile
Rank, 79th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 15 tracts In Rosemead
High
Within county
59 th percentile
Rank, 59th percentileLowHigh
#1,021 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Elevated
Within state
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#1,536 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Rosemead and the region

Centroid at 34.0590, -118.1038 · click any tract to drill in

Why South San Gabriel scores 9.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Rosemead
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
21.8% poverty · this tract
5.4
Supply constraint
$1,743 rent vs county FMR
1.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rosemead
8.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rosemead
9.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rosemead
7.3

How South San Gabriel compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
South San Gabriel risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.29.2This tracttract 482502Rosemead: 7.97.9Rosemeadparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 72

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within South San Gabriel. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in South San Gabriel

25% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1.6/10.

Food insecurity runs 32.6% against 17.8% nationally. Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 8/10. SNAP participation runs 26.8% against 15.2% nationally.

The poverty rate is 22%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. It sits 0.8 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4.

This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. Nationally it ranks #3,529 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 7.5/10.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.7 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037482502

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037482502?

Census tract 06037482502 in the South San Gabriel neighborhood scores 9.2/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037482502?

Median gross rent is $1,743/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037482502?

21.8% of residents in tract 06037482502 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,519.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037482502?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 72th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 79th, household 41th, minority 98th, housing 54th.
Q5

Is tract 06037482502 considered part of South San Gabriel?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037482502 fall within South San Gabriel (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037482502 struggle to pay rent?

About 19.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037482502 compare to Rosemead overall?

Tract 06037482502 scores 9.2/10, higher than the parent city of Rosemead at 7.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rosemead; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037482502 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Rosemead

Top eight tracts in Rosemead ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related