Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #3,797 of 84,120 nationally

Rosemead Eviction Risk: High

Tract 06037432901 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,034

Tract 06037432901 sits in Rosemead, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.1/10. Severe burden reaches 42%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
9.1
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 37% Stable renters 22% Owners 41%
Tract context
Occupied units1,211
Renter share59.2%
SVI overall0.77
Poverty rate17.9%
Median income$62,618

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
71 th percentile
Rank, 71st percentileLowHigh
#5 of 15 tracts In Rosemead
Elevated
Within county
57 th percentile
Rank, 57th percentileLowHigh
#1,066 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Elevated
Within state
82 th percentile
Rank, 82nd percentileLowHigh
#1,681 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
National
96 th percentile
Rank, 96th percentileLowHigh
#3,797 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Rosemead and the region

Centroid at 34.0767, -118.0709 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rosemead scores 9.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Rosemead
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
17.9% poverty · this tract
4.5
Supply constraint
$1,692 rent vs county FMR
1.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rosemead
8.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rosemead
9.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rosemead
7.3

How Rosemead compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Rosemead risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.19.1This tracttract 432901Rosemead: 7.97.9Rosemeadparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 77

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rosemead

The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9.3/10. Running cool, supply constraint reads 1.4/10. Set annual rent against average income of $62,618 and the ratio lands at 32%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.

63% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, higher than the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%. Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 8/10.

Food insecurity runs 29.1% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 23.7% against 15.2% nationally.

It sits 0.7 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 95% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 7.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.6 points hotter.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. Average gross rent is $1,692, close to the Rosemead average.

59% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037432901

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037432901?

Census tract 06037432901 in Rosemead scores 9.1/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037432901?

Median gross rent is $1,692/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 63% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037432901?

17.9% of residents in tract 06037432901 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,034.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037432901?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 77th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 79th, household 22th, minority 97th, housing 81th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 06037432901 struggle to pay rent?

About 18.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 06037432901 compare to Rosemead overall?

Tract 06037432901 scores 9.1/10, higher than the parent city of Rosemead at 7.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rosemead; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7

Was tract 06037432901 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Rosemead

Top eight tracts in Rosemead ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related