Skip to content
Gustine, California eviction risk overview
City brief · 6,133 residents

Gustine, CA Eviction Risk: ELEVATED

Merced County · Population 6,133

In 2026
Risk score
6
ELEVATED

49th percentile, California.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.5 Average3.5 Now6
10 5 1976 · score 1.5 1977 · score 1.5 1978 · score 1.5 1979 · score 1.6 1980 · score 1.6 1981 · score 1.6 1982 · score 1.7 1983 · score 1.6 1984 · score 1.6 1985 · score 1.6 1986 · score 1.6 1987 · score 1.7 1988 · score 1.8 1989 · score 1.8 1990 · score 2.0 1991 · score 2.0 1992 · score 2.6 1993 · score 2.7 1994 · score 2.7 1995 · score 2.7 1996 · score 2.8 1997 · score 2.9 1998 · score 2.9 1999 · score 3.0 2000 · score 3.1 2001 · score 3.2 2002 · score 3.3 2003 · score 3.3 2004 · score 3.2 2005 · score 3.3 2006 · score 3.4 2007 · score 3.4 2008 · score 4.3 2009 · score 4.4 2010 · score 4.5 2011 · score 4.6 2012 · score 4.6 2013 · score 4.7 2014 · score 4.8 2015 · score 4.9 2016 · score 5.2 2017 · score 5.5 2018 · score 5.7 2019 · score 5.9 2020 · score 6.7 2021 · score 6.7 2022 · score 6.7 2023 · score 6.7 2024 · score 6.4 2025 · score 5.6 2026 · score 6.0

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 6.0 Regional 6.0 State 6.8 Economic 6.2 Supply 8.4 Rent Control 4.2 Eviction 6.1 Tenant 8.8 Housing 3.5 6 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +4.4% (2024)
    6.0
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    6.0
  3. State political climate
    California legislature & governorship
    6.8
  4. Economic stress
    4.1% poverty · 19.3% unemp.
    6.2
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,395 average · 43.4% renters
    8.4
  6. Rent Control risk
    21.6% of income on rent
    4.2
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    264 days filing → judgment
    6.1
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    43.4% renters
    8.8
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    3.5
Geographic context

Risk heat across Gustine and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Gustine compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Merced County
Very Low
#23 of 24 cities
Rank in county, 4th percentileBottomTop
#23 of 24 cities in Merced County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in California
Moderate
#840 of 1,594 cities
Rank in state, 47th percentileBottomTop
#840 of 1,594 cities in California for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Gustine risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Gustine: 6.06.0GustineThis cityCounty: 6.56.5Countyavg in countyState: 7.27.2Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.25.2U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 6
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 6/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+4.5 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 264d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,395/mo. A contested eviction takes 264 days and costs $13,261-$35,614 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 43.4%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 6,133 residents, 43.4% rent. 22% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 4.1% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 6
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 6 and 6 (GOP margin +4.4% (2024)). State climate at 6.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6.8
    State politics
    The process

    Long calendar, heavy friction.

    State political climate 6.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 6.1, housing court bias 3.5, rent-control risk 4.2. The slow part is the calendar, not the motion practice.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +1.1 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 6.2
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 6.2. Supply constraint: 8.4. The numbers behind those: 4.1% poverty, 19.3% unemployment, 22% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Gustine sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) San Jose, CA · 261d · ~$24.2k all-in ($93/day) · score 9.6 San Jose Modesto, CA · 262d · ~$25.5k all-in ($97/day) · score 6.9 Modesto Tracy, CA · 295d · ~$23.0k all-in ($78/day) · score 6.4 Tracy Merced, CA · 283d · ~$26.9k all-in ($95/day) · score 6.6 Merced Manteca, CA · 255d · ~$23.1k all-in ($91/day) · score 6.4 Manteca Turlock, CA · 255d · ~$27.3k all-in ($107/day) · score 6.4 Turlock Gilroy, CA · 288d · ~$27.0k all-in ($94/day) · score 5.1 Gilroy Watsonville, CA · 255d · ~$26.3k all-in ($103/day) · score 5.6 Watsonville Los Angeles, CA · 273d · ~$22.4k all-in ($82/day) · score 10 Los Angeles San Diego, CA · 277d · ~$25.9k all-in ($94/day) · score 6.4 San Diego Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.7 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.9 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4.6 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 5.5 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 6.8 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.3 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.8 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 6.2 Seattle Gustine
Gustine · 264d · ~$24.4k all-in ($93/day) · score 6 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0-4   4-7   7-10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Gustine, CA

Landlording in Gustine, California, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 6/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Gustine is a city of 6,133 residents where 43.4% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 21.6% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,395/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Gustine eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 6.1/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Gustine closes 264 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Gustine's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 3.5/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Gustine runs $13,261 to $35,614 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1-2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 264 days of typical timeline and $1,395/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 8.8/10 in Gustine, and the city has limited rent control exposure (4.2/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In California, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Gustine: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match California's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $35,614 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Gustine

Trap · AB 1482
Politically, Merced County voted Democratic by 10.6 points in 2020, a baseline that correlates with tenant-protective legislative pressure. Combined with 21.6% rent-to-income ratio, expect baseline enforcement of AB 1482 + Costa-Hawkins.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my Gustine tenant damages the property beyond the security deposit?

If damages exceed the security deposit, you can sue the tenant in small claims court for the difference. However, collecting on such a judgment can be difficult, especially if the tenant has no assets or moves out of state. It's often a difficult decision whether the time and cost of pursuing the judgment are worth it.
Q2

Can I raise the rent in Gustine?

Yes, but there are limits due to California's statewide rent control (AB 1482). Rent increases are capped at 5% plus the percentage change in the cost of living (CPI), or 10%, whichever is lower, within any 12-month period. You must also provide proper notice, typically 30 or 60 days depending on the increase amount.
Q3

How do I handle a tenant who refuses to move after their lease ends?

If your property is subject to statewide just cause eviction (most are), you cannot simply refuse to renew a lease without a "just cause." If the lease ends and you don't have a just cause, the tenancy automatically converts to a month-to-month tenancy under the same terms. You then need a just cause to terminate it.
Q4

What if my tenant claims I didn't maintain the property?

Tenants in California have a right to a habitable living space. If they claim you haven't made necessary repairs, they might withhold rent (after proper notice) or use it as a defense in an eviction case. Respond promptly to maintenance requests, keep detailed records of all communications and repairs, and address habitability issues quickly to avoid these claims.
Q5

Should I offer a tenant a payment plan for back rent?

You can, but be cautious. If you accept a partial payment after issuing a 3-day notice, it can nullify the notice, forcing you to start over. If you offer a payment plan, get a written agreement signed by both parties, clearly stating that the original 3-day notice remains valid, or that a new one will be issued if the plan isn't met. Often, it's better to stick to the eviction process if the tenant is already significantly behind.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 6/10 places Gustine in the 49th percentile of California cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.