Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #13,812 of 84,120 nationally
Royal Palms Eviction Risk: Elevated , Cathedral City
Tract 06065044933 · Riverside, CA · pop 3,525 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
With a score of 6.8/10, tract 06065044933 in the Royal Palms area of Cathedral City, CA reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,525 residents. This is renter territory: 76% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.
Risk score
6.8
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 34%
Stable renters 42%
Owners 24%
Tract context
Occupied units1,005
Renter share75.9%
SVI overall0.86
Poverty rate11.2%
Median income$61,563
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
60
th percentile
Elevated
Within county
55
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
39
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Cathedral City and the region
Centroid at 33.8123, -116.4625 · click any tract to drill in
Why Royal Palms scores 6.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Cathedral City
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
11.2% poverty · this tract
2.8
Supply constraint
$1,605 rent vs county FMR
2.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cathedral City
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cathedral City
4.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cathedral City
5.3
How Royal Palms compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 86
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 88%Socioeconomic
- 69%Household composition
- 93%Racial/ethnic minority
- 69%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Royal Palms. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 29.3%Housing insecurity
- 13.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 34.7%Food insecurity
- 28.0%SNAP enrollment
- 16.4%Transit barriers
- 23.3%No health insurance
- 20.0%Frequent mental distress
- 38.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Royal Palms
The clearest offset is supply constraint at 2/10. Housing insecurity runs 29.3% against 14.2% nationally. Severe burden reaches 18%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Cost burden runs 45% here against 53.8% across Riverside County. SNAP participation runs 28.0% against 15.2% nationally.
On the softer side, economic stress reads 2.8/10. That is riskier than roughly 84% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8.7/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.
It tracks the Riverside County average of 6.6 closely. Average gross rent is $1,605, close to the Cathedral City average.
Annual rent works out to 31% of average household income of $61,563.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 06065044933
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06065044933?
Census tract 06065044933 in the Royal Palms neighborhood scores 6.8/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06065044933?
Median gross rent is $1,605/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06065044933?
11.2% of residents in tract 06065044933 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,525.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06065044933?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 86th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 88th, household 69th, minority 93th, housing 69th.
Q5
Is tract 06065044933 considered part of Royal Palms?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06065044933 fall within Royal Palms (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06065044933 struggle to pay rent?
About 29.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 13.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06065044933 compare to Cathedral City overall?
Tract 06065044933 scores 6.8/10, higher than the parent city of Cathedral City at 6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cathedral City; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Cathedral City
Top eight tracts in Cathedral City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
Royal Palms
7.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Caliente Sands
7.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
06065044702
7.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Royal Palms
7.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Caliente Sands
7.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
Royal Palms
6.9
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
06065044932
6.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · CA
06065044926
6.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Related