Skip to content
Neighborhood · Cathedral City, CA

Royal Palms Eviction Risk: Elevated

4 census tracts · pop 13,293 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 7.2/10 · range 6.8–7.4

Royal Palms takes in 4 census tracts of Cathedral City, CA, population 13,293. That produces an Eviction Risk Score of 7.2/10, Elevated tier. Cost burden runs 58% against 35.8% citywide, putting Royal Palms 22.2% over its own city.

Annualized rent equals 37% of average household income here, past the 30% affordability line, which compresses the margin any screening standard has to work with. The severe-burden share is 25%. Those renters are past the 50% mark, and they miss rent for reasons that have nothing to do with willingness to pay.

Pulling the other way is supply constraint, at 1.8/10. SNAP participation is 26.4% of households versus 15.2% nationally.

The poverty rate is 17%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than the filing statistics suggest. 19.7% of adults carry no health insurance against 11.3% nationally, a common route into sudden unpayable debt.

Social vulnerability runs high at 8.4/10, concentrating the disaster- and displacement-exposure this model treats as a lagging risk input. Its 4 tracts score within 0.6 points of one another, so the area figure travels well to individual addresses.

Average gross rent runs $1,570, close to the Cathedral City average. 64% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

The area figure travels well to individual addresses here, though the per-tract table below still carries the detail. The number is rebuilt whenever its ACS, court-record, or statutory inputs change.

Risk score
7.2
Elevated
4 tracts · population-weighted
Royal Palms vs Cathedral City How this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
% of income on rent
58.0% +62%
Cathedral City: 35.8%
Average gross rent
$1,570 -2%
Cathedral City: $1,601
Average HH income
$50,811 -29%
Cathedral City: $71,220
Poverty rate
16.5% +8%
Cathedral City: 15.3%
Renter share
63.6% +90%
Cathedral City: 33.5%
Peer neighborhoods

Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk

Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Royal Palms and the region

Click any tract to drill in · 4 tracts span score 6.8–7.4

Why Royal Palms scores 7.2

9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendly
State political climate
legislature & governorship · Range 6.8–6.8 across tracts
6.8
Regional political climate
County-level mix · 2024 presidential margin · Range 5.4–5.4 across tracts
5.4
Local political climate
Parent city governance · Range 5.9–5.9 across tracts
5.9
Rent control risk
58% of income on rent · Range 6.0–6.0 across tracts
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State notice requirements & court backlog · Range 6.4–6.4 across tracts
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
64% renter households · Range 4.9–4.9 across tracts
4.9
Housing court bias
County bench composition · Range 5.3–5.3 across tracts
5.3
Economic stress
16.5% below poverty line · Range 2.8–5.3 across tracts
4.1
Supply constraint
Rent-to-FMR gap & zoning friction · Range 1.0–2.1 across tracts
1.8
Risk score comparison

Royal Palms vs. parent city, state, U.S.

Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).

Royal Palms score vs. parent city, state, U.S.Royal Palms: 7.27.2Royal PalmsNeighborhoodParent city: 6.06.0Parent cityhost cityState: 7.67.6Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.15.1U.S.national avgU.S. avg = 5.0
Variance across tracts

How uniformly does eviction risk play out in Royal Palms?

Left: distribution of constituent tract scores. Right: every tract as a heat square. Click any square to drill in.

Score distribution
0246810
Spread of 0.6 points from 6.8 to 7.4. Tracts are relatively uniform, so conditions feel similar throughout the neighborhood.
Tracts as heat grid
Each square = one census tract. Color tracks the same green→red ramp as the chloropleth map above.
Census tracts

4 tracts in Royal Palms

Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.

Tract Score Pop % over 30% on rent Average rent
06065044907 7.4 5,101 65% $1,623
06065044934 7.4 2,419 64% $1,335
06065941100 6.9 2,248 56% $1,648
06065044933 6.8 3,525 45% $1,605
Social Vulnerability Index

CDC SVI percentile: 82

Pop-weighted across 4 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.

Socioeconomic status 87%ile
Poverty, unemployment, no-HS-diploma, housing cost burden
Household characteristics 69%ile
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority 81%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport 63%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted

Eviction-adjacent indicators in Royal Palms

Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.

Frequently asked

About Royal Palms

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for Royal Palms?

Royal Palms scores 7.2/10 (Elevated tier) across 4 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2

How does Royal Palms compare to Cathedral City overall?

Royal Palms scores 1.2 points higher than Cathedral City overall (6/10). Renters spend 58% of income on rent vs 36% citywide. Average rent: $1,570 vs $1,601.
Q3

What is the average rent in Royal Palms?

Average gross rent in Royal Palms is $1,570/month (pop-weighted across 4 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 58% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4

What percentage of Royal Palms residents are renters?

64% of Royal Palms households are renter-occupied (vs 34% in Cathedral City). The neighborhood has 13,293 residents.
Q5

Is Royal Palms a high social-vulnerability area?

Royal Palms sits in the 82nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (highly vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6

Which tracts in Royal Palms have the highest eviction risk?

The highest-risk constituent tract in Royal Palms is census tract 06065044907 (score 7.4/10). Across the 4 tracts in this neighborhood the score ranges from 6.8 to 7.4, a spread of 0.6 points.
Q7

How safe is Royal Palms for landlords?

Royal Palms carries a elevated-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (7.2/10). Pop-weighted across 4 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Cathedral City as a whole (6/10), this neighborhood is higher-risk.
Q8

What is the demographic breakdown of Royal Palms?

Royal Palms has 13,658 residents. Top groups: Hispanic / Latino (72.7%), White (non-Hispanic) (21.4%), Asian (non-Hispanic) (2.7%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
Nearby

Other neighborhoods near Royal Palms

Sibling neighborhoods

Other neighborhoods inside Cathedral City

Same parent city, ranked by score similarity to Royal Palms.

Zoom out

Up the geography chain · or explore further