Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #5,690 of 84,120 nationally

Royal Palms Eviction Risk: Elevated , Cathedral City

Tract 06065044907 · Riverside, CA · pop 5,101 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

Census tract 06065044907 covers Royal Palms in Cathedral City, home to 5,101 residents. For landlords it grades 6.3/10, an elevated reading. On the national scale it ranks #13,820 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 65% of renter households, a severe level, and 29% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,623 a month against an average household income of $48,571 a year, roughly 40% of income at the averages. Renters make up 70% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
6.8
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 45% Stable renters 24% Owners 31%
Tract context
Occupied units1,420
Renter share69.7%
SVI overall0.89
Poverty rate20.4%
Median income$48,571

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 4 tracts In Royal Palms
Elevated
Within parent city
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 16 tracts In Cathedral City
High
Within county
87 th percentile
Rank, 87th percentileLowHigh
#71 of 518 tracts In Riverside
High
Within state
74 th percentile
Rank, 74th percentileLowHigh
#2,402 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Cathedral City and the region

Centroid at 33.8086, -116.4712 · click any tract to drill in

Why Royal Palms scores 6.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cathedral City
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
20.4% poverty · this tract
5.1
Supply constraint
$1,623 rent vs county FMR
2.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cathedral City
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cathedral City
4.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cathedral City
5.3

How Royal Palms compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Royal Palms risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.86.8This tracttract 044907Cathedral City: 7.87.8Cathedral Cityparent cityCounty: 5.15.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 89

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Royal Palms. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Royal Palms

What moves this score most is eviction process difficulty at 6.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Cathedral City, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Riverside County average of 6.2 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 31.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 15.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 89th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06065044907

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06065044907?

Census tract 06065044907 in the Royal Palms neighborhood scores 6.8/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06065044907?

Median gross rent is $1,623/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 65% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06065044907?

20.4% of residents in tract 06065044907 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,101.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06065044907?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 89th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 96th, household 76th, minority 92th, housing 56th.
Q5

Is tract 06065044907 considered part of Royal Palms?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06065044907 fall within Royal Palms (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06065044907 struggle to pay rent?

About 31.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 15.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06065044907 compare to Cathedral City overall?

Tract 06065044907 scores 6.8/10, lower than the parent city of Cathedral City at 7.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cathedral City; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Cathedral City

Top eight tracts in Cathedral City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related