Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #5,198 of 84,120 nationally

Royal Palms Eviction Risk: Elevated , Cathedral City

Tract 06065044934 · Riverside, CA · pop 2,419 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

In Royal Palms in Cathedral City, census tract 06065044934 scores 6.2/10 for eviction risk. It lands near the 81st percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

64% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 21% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,335 a month while the average household earns $36,219 a year, roughly 44% of income at the averages. Renters make up 83% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
6.9
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 53% Stable renters 30% Owners 17%
Tract context
Occupied units893
Renter share82.9%
SVI overall0.96
Poverty rate21.1%
Median income$36,219

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 4 tracts In Royal Palms
Very High
Within parent city
87 th percentile
Rank, 87th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 16 tracts In Cathedral City
High
Within county
89 th percentile
Rank, 89th percentileLowHigh
#58 of 518 tracts In Riverside
High
Within state
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#2,277 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Cathedral City and the region

Centroid at 33.8051, -116.4624 · click any tract to drill in

Why Royal Palms scores 6.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cathedral City
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
21.1% poverty · this tract
5.3
Supply constraint
$1,335 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cathedral City
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cathedral City
4.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cathedral City
5.3

How Royal Palms compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Royal Palms risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.96.9This tracttract 044934Cathedral City: 7.87.8Cathedral Cityparent cityCounty: 5.15.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 96

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Royal Palms. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Royal Palms

The heaviest input here is eviction process difficulty at 6.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Cathedral City, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Riverside County average of 6.2 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 96th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

In CDC survey modeling, about 31.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 16.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06065044934

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06065044934?

Census tract 06065044934 in the Royal Palms neighborhood scores 6.9/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06065044934?

Median gross rent is $1,335/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 64% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06065044934?

21.1% of residents in tract 06065044934 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,419.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06065044934?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 96th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 99th, household 72th, minority 93th, housing 82th.
Q5

Is tract 06065044934 considered part of Royal Palms?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06065044934 fall within Royal Palms (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06065044934 struggle to pay rent?

About 31.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 16.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06065044934 compare to Cathedral City overall?

Tract 06065044934 scores 6.9/10, lower than the parent city of Cathedral City at 7.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cathedral City; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Cathedral City

Top eight tracts in Cathedral City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related