Neighborhood · Ranked #13,349 of 84,120 nationally
Royal Palms Eviction Risk: Elevated , Cathedral City
Tract 06065941100 ·
Riverside, CA · pop 2,248 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
Tract 06065941100 sits in the Royal Palms area of Cathedral City, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 6.9/10. It is home to 2,248 residents. The severe-burden share is 30%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Risk score
6.9
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5%Stable renters 4%Owners 91%
Tract context
Occupied units1,441
Renter share9.9%
SVI overall0.48
Poverty rate11.2%
Median income$54,736
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
33th percentile
#3 of 4 tracts In Royal Palms
Low
Within parent city
67th percentile
#6 of 16 tracts In Cathedral City
Elevated
Within county
58th percentile
#219 of 518 tracts In Riverside
Elevated
Within state
41th percentile
#5,398 of 9,109 tracts In California
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Cathedral City and the region
Centroid at 33.7938, -116.4663 · click any tract to drill in
Why Royal Palms scores 6.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cathedral City
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
11.2% poverty · this tract
2.8
Supply constraint
$1,648 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cathedral City
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cathedral City
4.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cathedral City
5.3
How Royal Palms compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 48
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
50%Socioeconomic
53%Household composition
22%Racial/ethnic minority
50%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Royal Palms. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
5.6%Housing insecurity
3.3%Utility-shutoff threat
7.6%Food insecurity
7.1%SNAP enrollment
4.5%Transit barriers
4.5%No health insurance
10.6%Frequent mental distress
40.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Royal Palms
Set annual rent against average income of $54,736 and the ratio lands at 36%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. The main counterweight is supply constraint at 2.1/10.
Food insecurity runs 7.6% against 17.8% nationally. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 2.8/10. SNAP participation runs 7.1% against 15.2% nationally.
Nationally it ranks #13,349 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 10% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.3/10. Rent takes 30% or more of income for 56% of renters. It tracks the Riverside County average of 6.6 closely.
Average gross rent is $1,648, close to the Cathedral City average.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 06065941100
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06065941100?
Census tract 06065941100 in the Royal Palms neighborhood scores 6.9/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06065941100?
Median gross rent is $1,648/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 56% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06065941100?
11.2% of residents in tract 06065941100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,248.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06065941100?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 48th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 50th, household 53th, minority 22th, housing 50th.
Q5
Is tract 06065941100 considered part of Royal Palms?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06065941100 fall within Royal Palms (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06065941100 struggle to pay rent?
About 5.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06065941100 compare to Cathedral City overall?
Tract 06065941100 scores 6.9/10, higher than the parent city of Cathedral City at 6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cathedral City; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Cathedral City
Top eight tracts in Cathedral City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.