Within neighborhood
67
th percentile
Elevated
Neighborhood · Ranked #3,529 of 84,120 nationally
Lawrence Park Eviction Risk: High , Fruitridge Pocket
Tract 06067004603 · Sacramento, CA · pop 2,966 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
Census tract 06067004603 covers part of the Lawrence Park area of Lemon Hill, CA, and scores 9.2/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,966. The severe-burden share is 35%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Risk score
9.2
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 44%
Stable renters 24%
Owners 32%
Tract context
Occupied units977
Renter share67.2%
SVI overall0.92
Poverty rate32.3%
Median income$48,750
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
33
th percentile
Low
Within county
90
th percentile
High
Within state
83
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Fruitridge Pocket and the region
Centroid at 38.5222, -121.4483 · click any tract to drill in
Why Lawrence Park scores 9.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Fruitridge Pocket
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
32.3% poverty · this tract
8.1
Supply constraint
$1,418 rent vs county FMR
1.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fruitridge Pocket
8.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fruitridge Pocket
9.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fruitridge Pocket
8.6
How Lawrence Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 92
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 84%Socioeconomic
- 98%Household composition
- 85%Racial/ethnic minority
- 71%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Lawrence Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 32.2%Housing insecurity
- 19.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 42.4%Food insecurity
- 46.1%SNAP enrollment
- 21.8%Transit barriers
- 20.5%No health insurance
- 23.3%Frequent mental distress
- 45.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Lawrence Park
Food insecurity runs 42.4% against 17.8% nationally. The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9.6/10. Cost burden runs 65% here against 50.2% across Sacramento County.
It sits 2.1 points above the Sacramento County average of 7.1. Set annual rent against average income of $48,750 and the ratio lands at 35%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.
On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1.4/10. The poverty rate is 32%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.
On the high side, housing-court posture reads 8.6/10. This is renter territory: 67% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. Disability prevalence runs 45.0% against 31.5% nationally.
Nationally it ranks #3,529 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 9.3/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.7 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured. Average gross rent is $1,418, close to the Lemon Hill average.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 06067004603
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067004603?
Census tract 06067004603 in the Lawrence Park neighborhood scores 9.2/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06067004603?
Median gross rent is $1,418/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 65% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06067004603?
32.3% of residents in tract 06067004603 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,966.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06067004603?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 92th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 84th, household 98th, minority 85th, housing 71th.
Q5
Is tract 06067004603 considered part of Lawrence Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06067004603 fall within Lawrence Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06067004603 struggle to pay rent?
About 32.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 19.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06067004603 compare to Fruitridge Pocket overall?
Tract 06067004603 scores 9.2/10, higher than the parent city of Fruitridge Pocket at 7.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fruitridge Pocket; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Fruitridge Pocket
Top eight tracts in Fruitridge Pocket ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related