Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Asian Pacific Thematic Historic District Eviction Risk: High , San Diego

Tract 06073005101 · San Diego, CA · pop 2,912 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

Tract 06073005101 sits in the Asian Pacific Thematic Historic District area of San Diego eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.9/10. It is home to 2,912 residents. 96% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.

Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 58% Stable renters 38% Owners 4%
Tract context
Occupied units1,509
Renter share96.0%
SVI overall0.79
Poverty rate25.5%
Median income$64,155

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
56 th percentile
Rank, 56th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 10 tracts In Asian Pacific Thematic Historic District
Elevated
Within parent city
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileLowHigh
#20 of 328 tracts In San Diego
Very High
Within county
97 th percentile
Rank, 97th percentileLowHigh
#27 of 736 tracts In San Diego
Very High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across San Diego and the region

Centroid at 32.7089, -117.1498 · click any tract to drill in

Why Asian Pacific Thematic Historic District scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from San Diego
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
25.5% poverty · this tract
6.4
Supply constraint
$2,422 rent vs county FMR
3.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Diego
8.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Diego
7.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Diego
7.5

How Asian Pacific Thematic Historic District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Asian Pacific Thematic Historic District risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.99.9This tracttract 005101San Diego: 8.68.6San Diegoparent cityCounty: 7.67.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 79

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Asian Pacific Thematic Historic District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Asian Pacific Thematic Historic District

The severe-burden share is 30%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Annualized rent equals 45% of average household income of $64,155, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. Against the San Diego County average of 7.6, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.3 points.

The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 8/10. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 8/10.

The poverty rate is 26%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Against San Diego County at 52.5%, 60% of renters here are cost-burdened.

SNAP participation runs 26.5% against 15.2% nationally. Running hot, local political climate reads 7.5/10.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 100th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 8.1/10.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06073005101

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06073005101?

Census tract 06073005101 in the Asian Pacific Thematic Historic District neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06073005101?

Median gross rent is $2,422/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 60% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06073005101?

25.5% of residents in tract 06073005101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,912.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06073005101?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 79th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 85th, household 4th, minority 85th, housing 98th.
Q5

Is tract 06073005101 considered part of Asian Pacific Thematic Historic District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06073005101 fall within Asian Pacific Thematic Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06073005101 struggle to pay rent?

About 20.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06073005101 compare to San Diego overall?

Tract 06073005101 scores 9.9/10, higher than the parent city of San Diego at 8.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Diego eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06073005101 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 39% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Diego

Top eight tracts in San Diego ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related