Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #4,393 of 84,120 nationally

Parkside Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco

Tract 06075035102 · San Francisco, CA · pop 4,458 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

With a score of 8.9/10, tract 06075035102 in the Parkside area of San Francisco, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score
8.9
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9% Stable renters 13% Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units1,271
Renter share22.7%
SVI overall0.37
Poverty rate4.7%
Median income$166,741

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
11 th percentile
Rank, 11th percentileLowHigh
#9 of 10 tracts In Parkside
Very Low
Within parent city
13 th percentile
Rank, 13th percentileLowHigh
#211 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
Very Low
Within county
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#209 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
Very Low
Within state
78 th percentile
Rank, 78th percentileLowHigh
#1,974 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across San Francisco and the region

Centroid at 37.7548, -122.4990 · click any tract to drill in

Why Parkside scores 8.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from San Francisco
9.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.6
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
4.7% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
5.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
10.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Francisco
9.5

How Parkside compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Parkside risk score vs. parent city / county / state8.9This tracttract 0351029.9San Franciscoparent city9.5Countyavg tract in county7.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 37

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Parkside. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Parkside

Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10. Average gross rent is $3,501, 41% above the San Francisco average. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10.

Severe burden reaches 15%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. SNAP participation runs 6.8% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 10.3% against 17.8% nationally.

This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for San Francisco. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 95th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

At 23% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 4.4/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.4 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

41% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent. It tracks the San Francisco County average of 9.5 closely.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06075035102

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075035102?

Census tract 06075035102 in the Parkside neighborhood scores 8.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06075035102?

Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 41% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06075035102?

4.7% of residents in tract 06075035102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,458.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06075035102?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 37th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 14th, household 51th, minority 80th, housing 53th.
Q5

Is tract 06075035102 considered part of Parkside?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06075035102 fall within Parkside (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06075035102 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06075035102 compare to San Francisco overall?

Tract 06075035102 scores 8.9/10, lower than the parent city of San Francisco at 9.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Francisco eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06075035102 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco

Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related