Foster City Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 06081608001 · San Mateo, CA · pop 3,531
With a score of $1/10, tract 06081608001 in Foster City ranks in the Moderate tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 3,531 residents. On the national scale it ranks #50,563 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 37% of renter households, a high level, and 24% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $3,473 a month while the average household earns $195,050 a year, roughly 21% of income at the averages. About 59% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Foster City and the region
Centroid at 37.5511, -122.2577 · click any tract to drill in
Why Foster City scores 4.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Foster City compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 28
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 15%Socioeconomic
- 39%Household composition
- 67%Racial/ethnic minority
- 40%Housing & transportation
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.2%Housing insecurity
- 3.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.3%Food insecurity
- 4.8%SNAP enrollment
- 4.3%Transit barriers
- 3.5%No health insurance
- 11.3%Frequent mental distress
- 17.9%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Foster City
The heaviest input here is eviction process difficulty at 6.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Foster City, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the San Mateo County average of 5.1 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is White and Asian and ranks around the 28th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
In CDC survey modeling, about 6.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
About tract 06081608001
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06081608001?
What is the average rent in tract 06081608001?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06081608001?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06081608001?
What share of households in tract 06081608001 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06081608001 compare to Foster City overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Foster City
Top eight tracts in Foster City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.