Skip to content
Mission Hills, California eviction risk overview
City brief · 3,859 residents

Mission Hills, CA Eviction Risk: HIGH

Santa Barbara County · Population 3,859

In 2026
Risk score
7.7
HIGH

39th percentile, California.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.3 Average4.2 Now7.7
8.8 2.3 1976 · score 2.5 1977 · score 2.5 1978 · score 2.4 1979 · score 2.4 1980 · score 2.4 1981 · score 2.4 1982 · score 2.6 1983 · score 2.6 1984 · score 2.5 1985 · score 2.5 1986 · score 2.3 1987 · score 2.3 1988 · score 2.4 1989 · score 2.5 1990 · score 2.6 1991 · score 2.7 1992 · score 3.5 1993 · score 3.5 1994 · score 3.6 1995 · score 3.4 1996 · score 3.4 1997 · score 3.4 1998 · score 3.5 1999 · score 3.5 2000 · score 3.5 2001 · score 3.5 2002 · score 3.5 2003 · score 3.5 2004 · score 3.5 2005 · score 3.4 2006 · score 3.5 2007 · score 3.6 2008 · score 4.4 2009 · score 4.7 2010 · score 4.8 2011 · score 4.9 2012 · score 4.9 2013 · score 4.8 2014 · score 4.8 2015 · score 4.8 2016 · score 5.3 2017 · score 5.4 2018 · score 5.6 2019 · score 6.4 2020 · score 8.8 2021 · score 8.4 2022 · score 8.1 2023 · score 7.8 2024 · score 8.0 2025 · score 7.8 2026 · score 7.7

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 6.9 Regional 6.9 State 6.8 Economic 4.6 Supply 7.1 Rent Control 2.6 Eviction 6.3 Tenant 5.1 Housing 2.8 7.7 HIGH
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +26.7% (2024)
    6.9
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    6.9
  3. State political climate
    California legislature & governorship
    6.8
  4. Economic stress
    4.9% poverty · 4.4% unemp.
    4.6
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,838 average · 18.7% renters
    7.1
  6. Rent Control risk
    21.5% of income on rent
    2.6
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    278 days filing → judgment
    6.3
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    18.7% renters
    5.1
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    2.8
Geographic context

Risk heat across Mission Hills and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Mission Hills compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Santa Barbara County
Very Low
#25 of 28 cities
Rank in county, 11th percentileLowHigh
#25 of 28 cities in Santa Barbara County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in California
Low
#1036 of 1,594 cities
Rank in state, 35th percentileLowHigh
#1036 of 1,594 cities in California for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Mission Hills risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Mission Hills: 7.77.7Mission HillsThis cityCounty: 8.08.0Countyavg in countyState: 8.48.4Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 7.7
    / 10 · HIGH
    The verdict

    A High-tier market.

    Composite 7.7/10. High statutory friction with active tenant counsel, so assume defenses on every filing. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+5.2 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 278d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,838/mo. A contested eviction takes 278 days and costs $13,218–$36,939 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 18.7%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 3,859 residents, 18.7% rent. 22% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 4.9% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 6.9
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 6.9 and 6.9 (Dem margin +26.7% (2024)). State climate at 6.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6.8
    State politics
    The process

    Long calendar, heavy friction.

    State political climate 6.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 6.3, housing court bias 2.8, rent-control risk 2.6. The slow part is the calendar, not the motion practice.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +1.3 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 4.6
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 4.6. Supply constraint: 7.1. The numbers behind those: 4.9% poverty, 4.4% unemployment, 22% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Mission Hills sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Santa Maria, CA · 296d · ~$25.7k all-in ($87/day) · score 8.1 Santa Maria Santa Barbara, CA · 288d · ~$27.6k all-in ($96/day) · score 8.1 Santa Barbara Los Angeles, CA · 273d · ~$22.4k all-in ($82/day) · score 9.9 Los Angeles San Diego, CA · 277d · ~$25.9k all-in ($94/day) · score 8.7 San Diego San Jose, CA · 261d · ~$24.2k all-in ($93/day) · score 9.2 San Jose San Francisco, CA · 273d · ~$23.9k all-in ($88/day) · score 9.7 San Francisco Fresno, CA · 279d · ~$24.4k all-in ($88/day) · score 8.9 Fresno Sacramento, CA · 281d · ~$25.0k all-in ($89/day) · score 9.2 Sacramento Long Beach, CA · 291d · ~$26.4k all-in ($91/day) · score 9.6 Long Beach Oakland, CA · 282d · ~$24.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 9.9 Oakland Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Mission Hills
Mission Hills · 278d · ~$25.1k all-in ($90/day) · score 7.7 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Mission Hills, CA

Landlording in Mission Hills, California, presents a high-friction environment where attorney involvement on every filing is the norm. The Eviction Risk Score is 7.7/10 (HIGH tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a High-friction landlord market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Mission Hills is a city of 3,859 residents where 18.7% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 21.5% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,838/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Mission Hills eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 6.3/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Mission Hills closes 278 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Mission Hills's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 2.8/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Mission Hills runs $13,218 to $36,939 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 278 days of typical timeline and $1,838/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 5.1/10 in Mission Hills, and the city has limited rent control exposure (2.6/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In California, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Mission Hills: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a HIGH tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match California's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $36,939 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Mission Hills

Trap · 2.6/10
Comparative benchmarking matters in markets like this. Mission Hills's 4.5/10 is below the California state average. Rent-control-risk sub-score: 2.6/10. See the nearby cities grid below for direct A-vs-B comparison.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What's the absolute fastest I can get a non-paying tenant out in Mission Hills?

Even with a perfect process, it's rarely "fast." The 3-day notice is quick, but then you're into court. Expect 2-3 months minimum if everything goes perfectly and the tenant doesn't fight it hard. The 278-day average is more realistic for contested cases. "Cash for keys" is your fastest option if the tenant agrees.
Q2

Can I evict a tenant for any reason in Mission Hills?

No. California has statewide just-cause eviction laws. You need a legally recognized reason, such as non-payment of rent, lease violations, or specific owner move-in scenarios. You can't just evict because you want to raise the rent beyond limits or sell the property (without specific conditions).
Q3

Do I really need an attorney for an eviction in California?

Yes, almost always. California eviction law is notoriously complex. Small procedural errors can lead to your case being dismissed, forcing you to start over and costing you months of lost rent and additional legal fees. An attorney ensures proper notices, filings, and court representation.
Q4

What's the biggest mistake landlords make in Mission Hills?

Trying to self-help evict (changing locks, turning off utilities) or making errors on the initial notice. Both are illegal and can lead to severe penalties, including fines and the tenant being able to stay for free. Another big mistake is not screening thoroughly or not having a compliant lease.
Q5

How much can I charge for a security deposit in Mission Hills?

The maximum security deposit you can charge is 1.00 month's rent. This is a statewide cap, regardless of whether the unit is furnished or unfurnished.
Q6

Is Mission Hills subject to rent control?

While Mission Hills itself doesn't have a local rent control ordinance, California has statewide rent control rules (AB 1482) that cap annual rent increases at 5% plus the percentage change in the cost of living, or 10%, whichever is lower. Most properties are subject to this. Check our California rent control rules for specifics.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 7.7/10 places Mission Hills in the 39th percentile of California cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.