Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #48,083 of 84,120 nationally

Swift Creek Eviction Risk: Lower , Redan

Tract 13089023313 · DeKalb County, GA · pop 5,589 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

Tract 13089023313, home to 5,589 residents in the Swift Creek area of Redan, scores 6.7/10 for landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #7,894 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 56% of renter households, a severe level, and 26% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,726 a month while the average household earns $60,676 a year, roughly 34% of income at the averages. About 25% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 14% Stable renters 11% Owners 75%
Tract context
Occupied units1,710
Renter share25.0%
SVI overall0.76
Poverty rate8.9%
Median income$60,676

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Swift Creek
Very Low
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 9 tracts In Redan
Moderate
Within county
53 th percentile
Rank, 53rd percentileLowHigh
#96 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
Moderate
Within state
49 th percentile
Rank, 49th percentileLowHigh
#1,413 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Redan and the region

Centroid at 33.7351, -84.1247 · click any tract to drill in

Why Swift Creek scores 3.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Redan
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
8.9% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$1,726 rent vs county FMR
4.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Redan
8.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Redan
8.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Redan
7.3

How Swift Creek compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Swift Creek risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.63.6This tracttract 023313Redan: 3.03.0Redanparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 76

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,166Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 43.20%Avg annual filing rate
  • 47.0%Peak (2014)
  • 186Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130890233132004: 65 filings (65.06/100 renter HHs)2007: 113 filings (45.95/100 renter HHs)2011: 132 filings (31.81/100 renter HHs)2012: 141 filings (33.98/100 renter HHs)2013: 155 filings (37.35/100 renter HHs)2014: 195 filings (46.99/100 renter HHs)2015: 179 filings (43.13/100 renter HHs)2016: 186 filings (41.33/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 186% over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 868Total filings 2020-21
  • 11.4Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 27 filings (270.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Swift Creek. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Swift Creek

The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 8.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Redan eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the DeKalb County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 22.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 15.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 1,166 eviction filings here over 8 tracked years, with about 43.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 47.0% of renter households in 2014.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 13089023313

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089023313?

Census tract 13089023313 in the Swift Creek neighborhood scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13089023313?

Median gross rent is $1,726/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 56% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13089023313?

8.9% of residents in tract 13089023313 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,589.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13089023313?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 76th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 78th, household 67th, minority 99th, housing 48th.
Q5

Is tract 13089023313 considered part of Swift Creek?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089023313 fall within Swift Creek (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13089023313?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,166 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 13089023313 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 43.20% of renter households, peaking at 47.0% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13089023313 struggle to pay rent?

About 22.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 15.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13089023313 compare to Redan overall?

Tract 13089023313 scores 3.6/10, higher than the parent city of Redan at 3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Redan eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Redan

Top eight tracts in Redan ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related