Skip to content
Neighborhood · North Chicago, IL

Five Points Eviction Risk: Moderate

5 census tracts · pop 12,073 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 4.9/10 · range 2.5–5.7

Five Points is a hispanic-white neighborhood in North Chicago with 5 census tracts and a population of 12,073 residents. The neighborhood's pop-weighted eviction-risk score of 4.9/10 (Moderate tier) blends state law, county-level filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty. 42% of renters here pay at least 30% of household income on rent, and 28% are severely cost-burdened (≥50% of income). Average gross rent of $1,210/month sits 15% lower than the North Chicago citywide average ($1,426).

Risk score
4.9
Moderate
5 tracts · population-weighted
Five Points vs North Chicago How this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
% of income on rent
42.3% +35%
North Chicago: 31.3%
Average gross rent
$1,210 -15%
North Chicago: $1,426
Average HH income
$43,796 -23%
North Chicago: $56,815
Poverty rate
19.0% -13%
North Chicago: 21.9%
Renter share
57.4% -15%
North Chicago: 67.4%
Peer neighborhoods

Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk

Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Five Points and the region

Click any tract to drill in · 5 tracts span score 2.5–5.7

Why Five Points scores 4.9

9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendly
State political climate
legislature & governorship · Range 5.2–5.2 across tracts
5.2
Regional political climate
County-level mix · 2024 presidential margin · Range 6.2–6.2 across tracts
6.2
Local political climate
Parent city governance · Range 6.6–6.6 across tracts
6.6
Rent control risk
42% of income on rent · Range 6.9–6.9 across tracts
6.9
Eviction process difficulty
State notice requirements & court backlog · Range 4.9–4.9 across tracts
4.9
Tenant organizing strength
57% renter households · Range 9.8–9.8 across tracts
9.8
Housing court bias
County bench composition · Range 7.6–7.6 across tracts
7.6
Economic stress
19.0% below poverty line · Range 3.0–6.4 across tracts
5.2
Supply constraint
Rent-to-FMR gap & zoning friction · Range 1.1–5.0 across tracts
3.4
Risk score comparison

Five Points vs. parent city, state, U.S.

Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).

Five Points score vs. parent city, state, U.S.Five Points: 4.94.9Five PointsNeighborhoodParent city: 4.84.8Parent cityhost cityState: 4.74.7Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avgU.S. avg = 5.0
Variance across tracts

How uniformly does eviction risk play out in Five Points?

Left: distribution of constituent tract scores. Right: every tract as a heat square. Click any square to drill in.

Score distribution
0246810
Spread of 3.2 points from 2.5 to 5.7. This neighborhood crosses multiple risk tiers, so block-by-block conditions vary substantially.
Tracts as heat grid
Each square = one census tract. Color tracks the same green→red ramp as the chloropleth map above.
Census tracts

5 tracts in Five Points

Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.

Tract Score Pop % over 30% on rent Average rent
17097863004 5.7 4,968 55% $1,736
17097863100 5.2 2,449 59% $1,081
17097863201 4.6 2,846 33% $1,174
17097863006 2.9 337
17097863005 2.5 1,473
Social Vulnerability Index

CDC SVI percentile: 79

Pop-weighted across 5 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.

Socioeconomic status 80%ile
Poverty, unemployment, no-HS-diploma, housing cost burden
Household characteristics 51%ile
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority 79%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport 67%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted

Eviction-adjacent indicators in Five Points

Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.

Frequently asked

About Five Points

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for Five Points?

Five Points scores 4.9/10 (Moderate tier) across 5 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2

How does Five Points compare to North Chicago overall?

Five Points scores 0.1 points higher than North Chicago overall (4.8/10). Renters spend 42% of income on rent vs 31% citywide. Average rent: $1,210 vs $1,426.
Q3

What is the average rent in Five Points?

Average gross rent in Five Points is $1,210/month (pop-weighted across 5 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4

What percentage of Five Points residents are renters?

57% of Five Points households are renter-occupied (vs 67% in North Chicago). The neighborhood has 12,073 residents.
Q5

Is Five Points a high social-vulnerability area?

Five Points sits in the 79th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (highly vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6

Which tracts in Five Points have the highest eviction risk?

The highest-risk constituent tract in Five Points is census tract 17097863004 (score 5.7/10). Across the 5 tracts in this neighborhood the score ranges from 2.5 to 5.7, a spread of 3.2 points.
Q7

How safe is Five Points for landlords?

Five Points carries a moderate-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (4.9/10). Pop-weighted across 5 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to North Chicago as a whole (4.8/10), this neighborhood is in line with the citywide level.
Q8

What is the demographic breakdown of Five Points?

Five Points has 13,219 residents (Hispanic-White Neighborhood). Top groups: Hispanic / Latino (39.4%), White (non-Hispanic) (29.7%), Black (non-Hispanic) (21.3%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
Nearby

Other neighborhoods near Five Points

Zoom out

Up the geography chain · or explore further