Skip to content
Lake Ka-Ho, Illinois eviction risk overview
City brief · 235 residents

Lake Ka-Ho, IL Eviction Risk: LOW

Macoupin County · Population 235

In 2026
Risk score
3.6
LOW

25th percentile, Illinois.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

Has Lake Ka-Ho been getting tougher on landlords? 1976 to 2026

Min2.6 Average3.4 Now3.6
4.6 2.6
Operator read

Of the 25 cities we track in the county, Lake Ka-Ho sits #15, mid-pack for its county. The 3.6/10 score has ranged only 2.6 to 4.6 across the 50-year reconstruction, so the environment is stable, not just currently favorable. The one number worth watching is housing-court posture at 7.2/10, since that is the input with the most room to move.

What do renters in Lake Ka-Ho earn, and what are they paying?

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

What is actually driving the Lake Ka-Ho score?

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.9 Regional 3.9 State 5.2 Economic 4.8 Supply 2.7 Rent Control 5.8 Eviction 4.8 Tenant 3.6 Housing 7.2 3.6 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +39.2% (2024)
    3.9
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    3.9
  3. State political climate
    Illinois legislature & governorship
    5.2
  4. Economic stress
    24.6% poverty · 4.8% unemp.
    4.8
  5. Supply constraint
    $777 average · 11.1% renters
    2.7
  6. Rent Control risk
    26.7% of income on rent
    5.8
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    124 days filing → judgment
    4.8
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    11.1% renters
    3.6
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    7.2
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lake Ka-Ho and the region

Click any city to see its score

Where does Lake Ka-Ho sit in the county pecking order?

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Macoupin County
Moderate
#15 of 25 cities
Rank in county, 42nd percentileLowHigh
#15 of 25 cities in Macoupin County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Illinois
Low
#1117 of 1,456 cities
Rank in state, 23rd percentileLowHigh
#1117 of 1,456 cities in Illinois for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Lake Ka-Ho risk score vs. county / state / U.S.3.6Lake Ka-HoThis city4.1Countyavg in county5.1Stateavg in state5.1U.S.national avg

Illinois landlord-tenant law

Eviction rules are set at the state level. These are the Illinois statutes, timelines and dollar figures that govern every property on this page.

Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 3.6
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 3.6/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+1.0 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 124d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $777/mo. A contested eviction takes 124 days and costs $5,493–$14,715 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026
  3. 11.1%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 235 residents, 11.1% rent. 27% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 24.6% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026
  4. 3.9
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3.9 and 3.9 (GOP margin +39.2% (2024)). State climate at 5.2, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 5.2
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 5.2/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 4.8, housing court bias 7.2, rent-control risk 5.8. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-0.2 since '00
    197620012026
  6. 4.8
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 4.8. Supply constraint: 2.7. The numbers behind those: 24.6% poverty, 4.8% unemployment, 27% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Lake Ka-Ho sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Springfield, IL · 129d · ~$9.3k all-in ($72/day) · score 4 Springfield Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.7 Chicago Aurora, IL · 120d · ~$10.2k all-in ($85/day) · score 4 Aurora Naperville, IL · 115d · ~$9.2k all-in ($80/day) · score 4.4 Naperville Joliet, IL · 114d · ~$8.4k all-in ($73/day) · score 3.8 Joliet Rockford, IL · 112d · ~$8.5k all-in ($76/day) · score 4 Rockford Elgin, IL · 129d · ~$9.9k all-in ($77/day) · score 4 Elgin Peoria, IL · 129d · ~$10.1k all-in ($79/day) · score 4 Peoria Champaign, IL · 118d · ~$8.9k all-in ($75/day) · score 6.3 Champaign Waukegan, IL · 116d · ~$9.0k all-in ($78/day) · score 4.3 Waukegan Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 3.7 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.6 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 4.3 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 8.1 Boston New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.6 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Lake Ka-Ho
Lake Ka-Ho · 124d · ~$10.1k all-in ($81/day) · score 3.6 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Lake Ka-Ho, IL

Landlording in Lake Ka-Ho, Illinois, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 3.6/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Lake Ka-Ho is a city of 235 residents where 11.1% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 26.7% of income on rent. At an average rent of $777/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Lake Ka-Ho eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 4.8/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Lake Ka-Ho closes 124 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Lake Ka-Ho's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 7.2/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Lake Ka-Ho runs $5,493 to $14,715 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 124 days of typical timeline and $777/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 3.6/10 in Lake Ka-Ho, and the city has limited rent control exposure (5.8/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Illinois, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Lake Ka-Ho: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Illinois's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $14,715 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Lake Ka-Ho

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
For state-level context, see the Illinois overview link in the guides section below. The score combines political climate, rent-to-income ratio, court bias, and tenant organizing strength under ILCS preemption + Chicago RLTO.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my Lake Ka-Ho tenant tries to pay after the 5-day notice but before I file in court?

If they pay the full amount owed within the 5-day notice period, you must accept it, and the notice is voided. If they pay after the 5 days are up but before you file the lawsuit, you can still accept it, but be careful. Accepting partial payment after the notice period can sometimes be interpreted as waiving your right to evict based on that specific notice. It's best to consult an attorney if this situation arises.

Q2

Can I evict a tenant in Lake Ka-Ho for having unauthorized pets?

Yes, if your lease explicitly prohibits pets or requires prior approval, and the tenant violates that clause, it's a lease violation. You'd typically issue a 10-day notice to cure or quit for such a breach, allowing them to remove the pet or face eviction. This is different from a non-payment notice.

Q3

How long does it take to get a court date in Macoupin County for an eviction?

After you file the complaint, it usually takes a few weeks for the tenant to be served and for the court to schedule the initial hearing. The exact timing can vary depending on court backlogs and the efficiency of service of process. Don't expect immediate action.

Q4

Is it true that I can't evict someone if they have a Section 8 voucher in Lake Ka-Ho?

No, that's a common misunderstanding. Illinois has statewide source-of-income protection, meaning you cannot discriminate against a tenant *because* they use a Section 8 voucher. However, you can still evict a Section 8 tenant for lease violations, including non-payment of their portion of the rent, just like any other tenant. All tenants must meet your screening criteria, regardless of their income source.

Q5

What should I do if my tenant abandons the property in Lake Ka-Ho?

If you believe the tenant has truly abandoned the property (e.g., moved out, stopped paying rent, removed belongings), you need to follow specific legal procedures before taking possession. Simply assuming abandonment can lead to legal trouble. Typically, you'd send a notice of abandonment, wait a specified period, and then re-enter. Document everything, including photos of the vacant unit. Consult an attorney to ensure you follow the correct steps for Illinois law.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 3.6/10 places Lake Ka-Ho in the 25th percentile of Illinois cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.