Skip to content
Neighborhood · Gaithersburg, MD

Pleasant Run Eviction Risk: High

1 census tracts · pop 3,471 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 8.2/10 · range 8.2–8.2

Pleasant Run maps to a single census tract in Gaithersburg, MD and houses 3,471 people. Scored across those inputs it reaches 8.2/10, placing it in the High tier. 54% of renters here are cost-burdened at the 30% threshold, dramatically above the Gaithersburg rate of 29.5%.

Severe burden reaches 28%. A tenant at that level absorbs no shock: one cut shift or one repair bill converts directly into arrears. What pushes the score up most is tenant-organizing strength at 9/10.

75% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building two streets over. Running hot is rent-regulation exposure at 7/10.

Food insecurity affects 26.0% of adults, 8.2 points above the national rate. 17.3% of adults carry no health insurance against 11.3% nationally, a common route into sudden unpayable debt. That places it #3 of 15 neighborhoods in Gaithersburg.

The closest comparables inside the same city are Walnut Hill and Oakmont Manor. Average gross rent runs $2,105, close to the Gaithersburg average.

Annual rent works out to 29% of average household income of $86,746.

One tract means one number: 8.2/10 applies directly to any address inside the boundary. The number is rebuilt whenever its ACS, court-record, or statutory inputs change.

Risk score
8.2
High
1 tracts · population-weighted
Pleasant Run vs Gaithersburg How this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
% of income on rent
53.8% +82%
Gaithersburg: 29.5%
Average gross rent
$2,105 +2%
Gaithersburg: $2,058
Average HH income
$86,746 -19%
Gaithersburg: $107,496
Poverty rate
12.5% +42%
Gaithersburg: 8.8%
Renter share
74.6% +52%
Gaithersburg: 49.2%
Peer neighborhoods

Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk

Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Pleasant Run and the region

Click any tract to drill in · 1 tracts span score 8.2–8.2

Why Pleasant Run scores 8.2

9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendly
State political climate
legislature & governorship · Range 5.7–5.7 across tracts
5.7
Regional political climate
County-level mix · 2024 presidential margin · Range 8.0–8.0 across tracts
8.0
Local political climate
Parent city governance · Range 8.2–8.2 across tracts
8.2
Rent control risk
54% of income on rent · Range 7.0–7.0 across tracts
7.0
Eviction process difficulty
State notice requirements & court backlog · Range 5.8–5.8 across tracts
5.8
Tenant organizing strength
75% renter households · Range 9.0–9.0 across tracts
9.0
Housing court bias
County bench composition · Range 5.9–5.9 across tracts
5.9
Economic stress
12.5% below poverty line · Range 3.1–3.1 across tracts
3.1
Supply constraint
Rent-to-FMR gap & zoning friction · Range 4.1–4.1 across tracts
4.1
Risk score comparison

Pleasant Run vs. parent city, state, U.S.

Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).

Pleasant Run score vs. parent city, state, U.S.8.2Pleasant RunNeighborhood6.9Parent cityhost city5.5Stateavg in state5.1U.S.national avgU.S. avg = 5.0
Census tracts

1 tracts in Pleasant Run

Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.

Tract Score Pop % over 30% on rent Average rent
24031700820 8.2 3,471 54% $2,105
Social Vulnerability Index

CDC SVI percentile: 72

Pop-weighted across 1 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.

Socioeconomic status 66%ile
Poverty, unemployment, no-HS-diploma, housing cost burden
Household characteristics 56%ile
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority 86%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport 66%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted

Eviction-adjacent indicators in Pleasant Run

Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.

Frequently asked

About Pleasant Run

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for Pleasant Run?

Pleasant Run scores 8.2/10 (High tier) across 1 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2

How does Pleasant Run compare to Gaithersburg overall?

Pleasant Run scores 1.3 points higher than Gaithersburg overall (6.9/10). Renters spend 54% of income on rent vs 30% citywide. Average rent: $2,105 vs $2,058.
Q3

What is the average rent in Pleasant Run?

Average gross rent in Pleasant Run is $2,105/month (pop-weighted across 1 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4

What percentage of Pleasant Run residents are renters?

75% of Pleasant Run households are renter-occupied (vs 49% in Gaithersburg). The neighborhood has 3,471 residents.
Q5

Is Pleasant Run a high social-vulnerability area?

Pleasant Run sits in the 72nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (moderately vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6

How safe is Pleasant Run for landlords?

Pleasant Run carries a high-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (8.2/10). Pop-weighted across 1 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Gaithersburg as a whole (6.9/10), this neighborhood is higher-risk.
Q7

What is the demographic breakdown of Pleasant Run?

Pleasant Run has 3,666 residents. Top groups: Hispanic / Latino (46.7%), Black (non-Hispanic) (19.7%), Asian (non-Hispanic) (16.3%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
Nearby

Other neighborhoods near Pleasant Run

Sibling neighborhoods

Other neighborhoods inside Gaithersburg

Same parent city, ranked by score similarity to Pleasant Run.

Zoom out

Up the geography chain · or explore further