Skip to content
Sharon, Massachusetts eviction risk overview
City brief · 6,232 residents

Sharon, MA Eviction Risk: ELEVATED

Norfolk County · Population 6,232

In 2026
Risk score
5.7
ELEVATED

42th percentile, Massachusetts.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.3 Average4.0 Now5.7
7.2 2.3 1976 · score 3.0 1977 · score 2.9 1978 · score 2.8 1979 · score 2.8 1980 · score 2.8 1981 · score 2.8 1982 · score 2.9 1983 · score 2.7 1984 · score 2.5 1985 · score 2.5 1986 · score 2.4 1987 · score 2.3 1988 · score 2.6 1989 · score 2.7 1990 · score 2.9 1991 · score 3.1 1992 · score 3.5 1993 · score 3.4 1994 · score 3.6 1995 · score 3.4 1996 · score 3.9 1997 · score 4.0 1998 · score 4.0 1999 · score 4.1 2000 · score 4.1 2001 · score 4.1 2002 · score 4.1 2003 · score 4.1 2004 · score 4.1 2005 · score 4.0 2006 · score 4.1 2007 · score 4.2 2008 · score 4.2 2009 · score 4.4 2010 · score 4.5 2011 · score 4.5 2012 · score 4.4 2013 · score 4.4 2014 · score 4.4 2015 · score 4.4 2016 · score 4.9 2017 · score 5.0 2018 · score 5.1 2019 · score 5.2 2020 · score 7.2 2021 · score 7.2 2022 · score 6.2 2023 · score 6.0 2024 · score 5.9 2025 · score 5.7 2026 · score 5.7

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 7.1 Regional 7.1 State 6.2 Economic 3.2 Supply 6.5 Rent Control 8.3 Eviction 5.7 Tenant 3.3 Housing 5.3 5.7 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +28.8% (2024)
    7.1
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    7.1
  3. State political climate
    Massachusetts legislature & governorship
    6.2
  4. Economic stress
    3.2% poverty · 1.8% unemp.
    3.2
  5. Supply constraint
    $2,576 average · 14.3% renters
    6.5
  6. Rent Control risk
    36.8% of income on rent
    8.3
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    218 days filing → judgment
    5.7
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    14.3% renters
    3.3
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    5.3
Geographic context

Risk heat across Sharon and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Sharon compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Norfolk County
Low
#14 of 19 cities
Rank in county, 28th percentileLowHigh
#14 of 19 cities in Norfolk County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Massachusetts
Low
#171 of 248 cities
Rank in state, 31st percentileLowHigh
#171 of 248 cities in Massachusetts for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Sharon risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Sharon: 5.75.7SharonThis cityCounty: 5.95.9Countyavg in countyState: 6.26.2Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 5.7
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 5.7/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+2.7 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 218d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $2,576/mo. A contested eviction takes 218 days and costs $10,703–$30,897 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 14.3%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 6,232 residents, 14.3% rent. 37% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 3.2% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 7.1
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 7.1 and 7.1 (Dem margin +28.8% (2024)). State climate at 6.2, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6.2
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 6.2/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 5.7, housing court bias 5.3, rent-control risk 8.3. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +0.7 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 3.2
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 3.2. Supply constraint: 6.5. The numbers behind those: 3.2% poverty, 1.8% unemployment, 37% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Sharon sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Worcester, MA · 184d · ~$19.8k all-in ($108/day) · score 6.4 Worcester Cambridge, MA · 212d · ~$19.8k all-in ($93/day) · score 7.1 Cambridge Lowell, MA · 198d · ~$19.9k all-in ($101/day) · score 6.1 Lowell Brockton, MA · 207d · ~$19.7k all-in ($95/day) · score 6.2 Brockton Quincy, MA · 216d · ~$18.5k all-in ($85/day) · score 6.2 Quincy Lynn, MA · 195d · ~$20.6k all-in ($106/day) · score 6 Lynn New Bedford, MA · 210d · ~$18.3k all-in ($87/day) · score 6.6 New Bedford Fall River, MA · 186d · ~$19.7k all-in ($106/day) · score 6 Fall River Newton, MA · 200d · ~$18.9k all-in ($95/day) · score 5.6 Newton Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Sharon
Sharon · 218d · ~$20.8k all-in ($95/day) · score 5.7 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Sharon, MA

Landlording in Sharon, Massachusetts, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 5.7/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Sharon is a city of 6,232 residents where 14.3% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 36.8% of income on rent. At an average rent of $2,576/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Sharon eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 5.7/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Sharon closes 218 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Sharon's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 5.3/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Sharon runs $10,703 to $30,897 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 218 days of typical timeline and $2,576/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 3.3/10 in Sharon, and the city sits at the top of the rent control risk spectrum (8.3/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Massachusetts, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Sharon: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Massachusetts's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $30,897 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Sharon

Trap · 36.3 POINTS
Politically, Norfolk County voted Democratic by 36.3 points in 2020, a baseline that correlates with tenant-protective legislative pressure. Combined with 36.8% rent-to-income ratio, expect baseline enforcement of MGL 239 + Housing Court.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my tenant just leaves without notice?

If a tenant abandons the property, you generally need to follow specific steps before re-taking possession and re-renting. Document everything: photos, attempts to contact the tenant. Massachusetts law requires you to store any abandoned personal property for a certain period. Consult an attorney before changing locks, just to be safe.
Q2

Can I raise the rent in Sharon?

Yes, Massachusetts does not have statewide rent control, as detailed in our Massachusetts rent control rules. You can raise the rent, but you must provide proper notice, typically 30 days, before the next rent due date. For month-to-month tenancies, this notice changes the terms of the tenancy. If the tenant refuses the increase, you can issue a notice to quit and pursue eviction, though this is a "no-cause" eviction and can be more challenging.
Q3

What if my tenant claims I didn't make repairs?

This is a common defense in eviction cases. Massachusetts has a strong "warranty of habitability." If you haven't made necessary repairs, the tenant might be able to withhold rent, or the court could reduce the rent owed. Always address repair requests promptly and in writing. Keep detailed records of all communications and repair work.
Q4

Can I evict a tenant for having a pet if my lease says "no pets"?

Generally, yes, if the lease explicitly prohibits pets and the pet is not a service animal or emotional support animal (which have different rules under fair housing laws). You would typically issue a notice to quit for a lease violation. However, be prepared for the tenant to argue the pet is a service animal, requiring specific documentation.
Q5

Do I have to accept Section 8 tenants in Sharon?

Yes. Massachusetts has source-of-income protection statewide. This means you cannot refuse to rent to someone solely because they use a Section 8 voucher or other rental assistance. You must treat them like any other applicant and apply your standard screening criteria fairly. For more on this and other rules, see our Massachusetts tenant protections guide.
Q6

What's the difference between District Court and Housing Court?

Housing Court specializes in landlord-tenant issues and often has judges with more experience in this area. District Courts handle a broader range of civil and criminal cases. For Sharon, you'd likely be in Dedham District Court or the Southeast Housing Court. Many landlords prefer Housing Court if available, but both have jurisdiction over evictions.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 5.7/10 places Sharon in the 42nd percentile of Massachusetts cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.