Tract 25027731601 ·
Worcester County, MA · pop 4,484 · neighborhood within 0.0 mi
With a score of 8/10, tract 25027731601 in the Elm Park area of Worcester, MA reads high for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,484. Severe burden reaches 37%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Risk score
8
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 45%Stable renters 45%Owners 10%
Tract context
Occupied units2,092
Renter share89.1%
SVI overall0.76
Poverty rate36.3%
Median income$38,918
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100th percentile
#1 of 2 tracts In Elm Park
Very High
Within parent city
82th percentile
#9 of 46 tracts In Worcester
High
Within county
97th percentile
#7 of 191 tracts In Worcester County
Very High
Within state
87th percentile
#213 of 1,613 tracts In Massachusetts
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Worcester and the region
Centroid at 42.2681, -71.8095 · click any tract to drill in
Why Elm Park scores 8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Worcester
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Massachusetts legislature & governorship
6.2
Economic stress
36.3% poverty · this tract
9.1
Supply constraint
$1,194 rent vs county FMR
1.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Worcester
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Worcester
7.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Worcester
7.0
How Elm Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 76
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
17.2%Housing insecurity
12.8%Utility-shutoff threat
24.1%Food insecurity
28.2%SNAP enrollment
14.6%Transit barriers
7.9%No health insurance
21.3%Frequent mental distress
32.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Elm Park
The score leans hardest on economic stress at 9.1/10. This is renter territory: 89% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. It sits 2.2 points above the Worcester County average of 5.8.
The poverty rate is 36%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Set annual rent against average income of $38,918 and the ratio lands at 37%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1.4/10.
SNAP participation runs 28.2% against 15.2% nationally. At $1,194 a month, rents run 20% under what the rest of Worcester commands.
Against Worcester County at 44.4%, about half of renters here are cost-burdened. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 7/10. On the national scale it lands near the 91st percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 7.8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the MA average is 6.2, so this tract runs 1.8 points hotter.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 25027731601
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 25027731601?
Census tract 25027731601 in the Elm Park neighborhood scores 8/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 25027731601?
Median gross rent is $1,194/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 25027731601?
36.3% of residents in tract 25027731601 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,484.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 25027731601?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 76th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 83th, household 23th, minority 59th, housing 85th.
Q5
Is tract 25027731601 considered part of Elm Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 25027731601 fall within Elm Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 25027731601 struggle to pay rent?
About 17.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 25027731601 compare to Worcester overall?
Tract 25027731601 scores 8/10, higher than the parent city of Worcester at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Worcester eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Worcester
Top eight tracts in Worcester ranked by composite eviction-risk score.