Skip to content
Winchendon, Massachusetts eviction risk overview
City brief · 4,331 residents

Winchendon, MA Eviction Risk: ELEVATED

Worcester County · Population 4,331

In 2026
Risk score
6.1
ELEVATED

89th percentile, Massachusetts.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.4 Average4.2 Now6.1
7.4 2.4 1976 · score 3.0 1977 · score 2.9 1978 · score 2.9 1979 · score 2.8 1980 · score 2.9 1981 · score 2.9 1982 · score 2.9 1983 · score 2.8 1984 · score 2.6 1985 · score 2.5 1986 · score 2.5 1987 · score 2.4 1988 · score 2.7 1989 · score 2.8 1990 · score 3.0 1991 · score 3.1 1992 · score 3.5 1993 · score 3.5 1994 · score 3.7 1995 · score 3.4 1996 · score 4.0 1997 · score 4.1 1998 · score 4.1 1999 · score 4.2 2000 · score 4.2 2001 · score 4.2 2002 · score 4.3 2003 · score 4.3 2004 · score 4.3 2005 · score 4.3 2006 · score 4.4 2007 · score 4.4 2008 · score 4.6 2009 · score 4.8 2010 · score 4.9 2011 · score 4.9 2012 · score 4.8 2013 · score 4.8 2014 · score 4.9 2015 · score 4.9 2016 · score 5.1 2017 · score 5.2 2018 · score 5.3 2019 · score 5.4 2020 · score 7.3 2021 · score 7.4 2022 · score 6.4 2023 · score 6.1 2024 · score 6.3 2025 · score 6.2 2026 · score 6.1

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 6.3 Regional 6.3 State 6.2 Economic 7.0 Supply 7.8 Rent Control 6.9 Eviction 6.0 Tenant 8.3 Housing 6.8 6.1 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +10.0% (2024)
    6.3
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    6.3
  3. State political climate
    Massachusetts legislature & governorship
    6.2
  4. Economic stress
    14.3% poverty · 6.2% unemp.
    7.0
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,163 average · 42.7% renters
    7.8
  6. Rent Control risk
    35.1% of income on rent
    6.9
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    210 days filing → judgment
    6.0
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    42.7% renters
    8.3
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    6.8
Geographic context

Risk heat across Winchendon and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Winchendon compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Worcester County
Elevated
#10 of 35 cities
Rank in county, 74th percentileLowHigh
#10 of 35 cities in Worcester County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Massachusetts
High
#48 of 248 cities
Rank in state, 81st percentileLowHigh
#48 of 248 cities in Massachusetts for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Winchendon risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Winchendon: 6.16.1WinchendonThis cityCounty: 6.16.1Countyavg in countyState: 6.26.2Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 6.1
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 6.1/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+3.1 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 210d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,163/mo. A contested eviction takes 210 days and costs $11,996–$23,829 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 42.7%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 4,331 residents, 42.7% rent. 35% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 14.3% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 6.3
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 6.3 and 6.3 (Dem margin +10.0% (2024)). State climate at 6.2, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6.2
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 6.2/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 6, housing court bias 6.8, rent-control risk 6.9. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +1.0 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 7
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 7. Supply constraint: 7.8. The numbers behind those: 14.3% poverty, 6.2% unemployment, 35% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Winchendon sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Worcester, MA · 184d · ~$19.8k all-in ($108/day) · score 6.4 Worcester Springfield, MA · 191d · ~$20.6k all-in ($108/day) · score 6.7 Springfield Lowell, MA · 198d · ~$19.9k all-in ($101/day) · score 6.1 Lowell Newton, MA · 200d · ~$18.9k all-in ($95/day) · score 5.6 Newton Lawrence, MA · 188d · ~$17.9k all-in ($95/day) · score 6.2 Lawrence Framingham, MA · 189d · ~$20.6k all-in ($109/day) · score 5.7 Framingham Haverhill, MA · 186d · ~$22.5k all-in ($121/day) · score 5.9 Haverhill Waltham, MA · 184d · ~$20.0k all-in ($109/day) · score 5.6 Waltham Chicopee, MA · 203d · ~$21.3k all-in ($105/day) · score 6 Chicopee Methuen, MA · 205d · ~$19.1k all-in ($93/day) · score 6 Methuen Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Winchendon
Winchendon · 210d · ~$17.9k all-in ($85/day) · score 6.1 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Winchendon, MA

Landlording in Winchendon, Massachusetts, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 6.1/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Winchendon is a city of 4,331 residents where 42.7% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 35.1% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,163/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Winchendon eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 6/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Winchendon closes 210 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Winchendon's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 6.8/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Winchendon runs $11,996 to $23,829 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 210 days of typical timeline and $1,163/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 8.3/10 in Winchendon, and the city carries meaningful rent control exposure (6.9/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Massachusetts, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Winchendon: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Massachusetts's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $23,829 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Winchendon

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
Cost-versus-timeline trade-off: at 210 days and roughly $23,829 on the high end, cash-for-keys at $9,531 to $14,297 typically beats the legal route for non-aggravated cases. Default judgment frequency is high under MGL 239 + Housing Court.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What happens if a tenant files for bankruptcy during an eviction?

If a tenant files for bankruptcy, it triggers an "automatic stay," which immediately halts all eviction proceedings. You cannot proceed without getting permission from the bankruptcy court. This is a complex legal situation, and you absolutely need to consult with an attorney specializing in both landlord-tenant and bankruptcy law immediately.

Q2

Can I evict a tenant for lease violations other than non-payment?

Yes, you can. For lease violations, you typically need to provide a "Notice to Quit" that specifies the violation and gives the tenant a reasonable time (often 7 or 14 days, depending on the violation and lease terms) to "cure" the breach. If they don't fix the issue, you can then proceed with filing for eviction. Always reference your lease terms and state law for specific notice requirements.

Q3

Is "cash for keys" legal in Massachusetts?

Yes, "cash for keys" is legal and often a smart business decision in Massachusetts. It's a voluntary agreement where you offer a tenant money to vacate the property by a certain date, leaving it in good condition. This can save you the significant time and cost of a formal eviction. Make sure any such agreement is in writing and clearly outlines the terms.

Q4

What if the tenant leaves personal property behind after eviction?

Massachusetts law has specific rules for handling abandoned property. You can't just throw it out. You typically need to store the property for a certain period (often 30 days) and provide notice to the tenant. After that period, if the tenant hasn't claimed it, you may be able to sell it or dispose of it. Consult an attorney or state guidelines to avoid liability.

Q5

Do I need a lawyer for every eviction in Winchendon?

While not legally required for every step, given Winchendon's 6.6/10 eviction risk score, the complexity of Massachusetts law, and the potential costs and timelines, it is highly recommended to have an attorney involved from the moment you decide to pursue an eviction. Trying to do it yourself is a false economy that almost always costs more in the long run.

Q6

Are there any specific tenant protections in Winchendon beyond state law?

While Winchendon itself doesn't have unique municipal tenant protections beyond state law, it's important to be aware that Massachusetts has strong statewide tenant protections. These include source-of-income protection, strict security deposit rules, and detailed requirements for notices and court procedures. Always assume the tenant has significant rights under state law. Our Massachusetts tenant protections guide provides a good overview.

===META_TITLE=== Winchendon, MA Eviction Risk 6.6/10: High Costs, Long Timelines ===META_DESC=== Winchendon, MA's 6.6/10 eviction risk means high costs ($11,996-$23,829) and long timelines (210 days). Landlords face strong tenant protections. Get practical steps here. ===INTRO_HTML===

Landlords in Winchendon, Massachusetts, face a unique set of challenges and opportunities. With a population of just over 4,300, it's a smaller market, but don't let the size fool you. The local rental scene has some serious headwinds for property owners. Our data gives Winchendon an Eviction Risk Score of 6.6/10. That puts it squarely in the "elevated risk" tier. This isn't a market where you can afford to be lax on your processes or assume things will be easy. Forget the idea of a quick fix if a tenant stops paying.

This elevated score isn't just a number; it reflects a combination of factors. Winchendon has a significant rent-to-income ratio at 35.1% of average income, meaning many tenants are stretched thin. Couple that with 42.7% of occupied units being rentals, and you have a market where economic stress (7/10 sub-score) and tenant organizing strength (a high 8.3/10 sub-score) mean landlords need to be extra diligent. Understanding these factors is critical for any landlord looking to protect their investment here.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 6.1/10 places Winchendon in the 89th percentile of Massachusetts cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.