Skip to content
Neighborhood · Haslett, MI

Whitehills Lakes Eviction Risk: Moderate

1 census tracts · pop 3,725 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 5.5/10 · range 5.5–5.5

Whitehills Lakes is a one-tract neighborhood of Haslett, MI and houses 3,725 people. That produces an Eviction Risk Score of 5.5/10, Moderate tier. 52% of renters here are cost-burdened at the 30% threshold, well clear of the Haslett rate of 29.3%.

Severe burden reaches 26%. A tenant at that level absorbs no shock: one cut shift or one repair bill converts directly into arrears. The strongest single driver of the headline number is tenant-organizing strength at 8.4/10. This is a renter market: 67% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.

The poverty rate is 28%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than the filing statistics suggest. On the softer side is eviction-process difficulty, at 2.9/10. Running hot is economic stress at 7/10.

Among the 5 mapped neighborhoods of Haslett, it ranks #1 by risk, the upper third. For a like-for-like read, Hillbrook Park and Village of Nemoka score within a fraction of it. Average gross rent runs $1,159, close to the Haslett average.

Annual rent works out to 26% of average household income of $52,955.

Because the boundary contains one tract, 5.5/10 is simultaneously the area figure and the address-level figure. The number is rebuilt whenever its ACS, court-record, or statutory inputs change.

Risk score
5.5
Moderate
1 tracts · population-weighted
Whitehills Lakes vs Haslett How this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
% of income on rent
51.9% +77%
Haslett: 29.3%
Average gross rent
$1,159 +3%
Haslett: $1,125
Average HH income
$52,955 -29%
Haslett: $74,164
Poverty rate
28.0% +181%
Haslett: 10.0%
Renter share
66.9% +65%
Haslett: 40.6%
Peer neighborhoods

Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk

Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Whitehills Lakes and the region

Click any tract to drill in · 1 tracts span score 5.5–5.5

Why Whitehills Lakes scores 5.5

9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendly
State political climate
legislature & governorship · Range 3.3–3.3 across tracts
3.3
Regional political climate
County-level mix · 2024 presidential margin · Range 6.6–6.6 across tracts
6.6
Local political climate
Parent city governance · Range 6.9–6.9 across tracts
6.9
Rent control risk
52% of income on rent · Range 6.6–6.6 across tracts
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State notice requirements & court backlog · Range 2.9–2.9 across tracts
2.9
Tenant organizing strength
67% renter households · Range 8.4–8.4 across tracts
8.4
Housing court bias
County bench composition · Range 5.9–5.9 across tracts
5.9
Economic stress
28.0% below poverty line · Range 7.0–7.0 across tracts
7.0
Supply constraint
Rent-to-FMR gap & zoning friction · Range 5.3–5.3 across tracts
5.3
Risk score comparison

Whitehills Lakes vs. parent city, state, U.S.

Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).

Whitehills Lakes score vs. parent city, state, U.S.5.5Whitehills LakesNeighborhood4.1Parent cityhost city4.2Stateavg in state5.1U.S.national avgU.S. avg = 5.0
Census tracts

1 tracts in Whitehills Lakes

Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.

Tract Score Pop % over 30% on rent Average rent
26065004500 5.5 3,725 52% $1,159
Social Vulnerability Index

CDC SVI percentile: 47

Pop-weighted across 1 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.

Socioeconomic status 57%ile
Poverty, unemployment, no-HS-diploma, housing cost burden
Household characteristics 14%ile
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority 57%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport 53%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted

Eviction-adjacent indicators in Whitehills Lakes

Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.

Frequently asked

About Whitehills Lakes

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for Whitehills Lakes?

Whitehills Lakes scores 5.5/10 (Moderate tier) across 1 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2

How does Whitehills Lakes compare to Haslett overall?

Whitehills Lakes scores 1.4 points higher than Haslett overall (4.1/10). Renters spend 52% of income on rent vs 29% citywide. Average rent: $1,159 vs $1,125.
Q3

What is the average rent in Whitehills Lakes?

Average gross rent in Whitehills Lakes is $1,159/month (pop-weighted across 1 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4

What percentage of Whitehills Lakes residents are renters?

67% of Whitehills Lakes households are renter-occupied (vs 41% in Haslett). The neighborhood has 3,725 residents.
Q5

Is Whitehills Lakes a high social-vulnerability area?

Whitehills Lakes sits in the 47th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (less vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6

How safe is Whitehills Lakes for landlords?

Whitehills Lakes carries a moderate-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (5.5/10). Pop-weighted across 1 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Haslett as a whole (4.1/10), this neighborhood is higher-risk.
Q7

What is the demographic breakdown of Whitehills Lakes?

Whitehills Lakes has 3,632 residents. Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (63.4%), Other / Multiracial (13.6%), Asian (non-Hispanic) (12.3%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
Nearby

Other neighborhoods near Whitehills Lakes

Sibling neighborhoods

Other neighborhoods inside Haslett

Same parent city, ranked by score similarity to Whitehills Lakes.

Zoom out

Up the geography chain · or explore further