Within parent city
80
th percentile
High
Census Tract · Ranked #35,669 of 84,120 nationally
Chaska Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 27019090801 · Carver County, MN · pop 7,025
Census tract 27019090801 covers part of Chaska, MN, and scores 4.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 2.2/10.
Risk score
4.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16%
Stable renters 26%
Owners 58%
Tract context
Occupied units3,136
Renter share42.5%
SVI overall0.32
Poverty rate8.8%
Median income$100,851
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
88
th percentile
High
Within state
66
th percentile
Elevated
National
58
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Chaska and the region
Centroid at 44.8162, -93.6161 · click any tract to drill in
Why Chaska scores 4.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Chaska
5.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.8
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
8.8% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$1,414 rent vs county FMR
3.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chaska
4.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chaska
6.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chaska
3.9
How Chaska compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 32
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 22%Socioeconomic
- 50%Household composition
- 23%Racial/ethnic minority
- 51%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.6%Housing insecurity
- 5.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.4%Food insecurity
- 6.9%SNAP enrollment
- 6.5%Transit barriers
- 7.0%No health insurance
- 14.6%Frequent mental distress
- 25.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Chaska
13% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. It sits 0.9 points above the Carver County average of 3.9.
SNAP participation runs 6.9% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 10.4% against 17.8% nationally.
Average gross rent is $1,414, 9% below the Chaska average. That is riskier than roughly 58% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 3.9/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Rent consumes only 17% of average household income of $100,851, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.
Rent takes 30% or more of income for 38% of renters. 43% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 27019090801
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27019090801?
Census tract 27019090801 in Chaska scores 4.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 27019090801?
Median gross rent is $1,414/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 38% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 27019090801?
8.8% of residents in tract 27019090801 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,025.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 27019090801?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 32th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 22th, household 50th, minority 23th, housing 51th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 27019090801 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 27019090801 compare to Chaska overall?
Tract 27019090801 scores 4.8/10, higher than the parent city of Chaska at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chaska eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Chaska
Top eight tracts in Chaska ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related