Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Tenant beats landlord
16.8%
/ 100 outcomes
In court-decided eviction outcomes for Faucett, MO, tenants prevail in roughly 16.8% of contested cases. A higher number means landlords face stronger tenant defenses, longer calendars, and more required documentation, and landlord-friendliness drops as this rises.
Timeline
43d
filing → judgment
From the moment an unlawful-detainer notice is filed in Faucett, MO until a money judgment is entered, a contested eviction takes about 43 days on average. Longer timelines mean more lost rent and higher carry costs for landlords.
Cost range
$1.1–3.2k
legal + lost rent
A typical eviction in Faucett, MO costs landlords $1,056 to $3,173 all-in, covering court filing fees, process-server costs, attorney time, and lost rent during the calendar between filing and possession.
Average rent
$840
19% stretched on rent
Average gross rent in Faucett, MO is $840 per month per the U.S. Census American Community Survey (5-year 2023). 19% of renter households here spend more than 30% of pre-tax income on rent, the federal cost-burden threshold.
Renters
16.3%
of households
16.3% of occupied housing units in Faucett, MO are renter-occupied (vs owner-occupied). A higher renter share usually correlates with more eviction filings, more turnover, and a more active rental market.
Poverty
12.7%
2.3% unemp.
12.7% of Faucett, MO residents live below the federal poverty line, and unemployment runs at 2.3%. Both feed into the economic-stress sub-score in our Eviction Risk Score model because rent payment problems track poverty + joblessness more reliably than any other single signal.
Time machine
Scrub 50 years
197619861996200620162026
2026
● LIVE · today◀ REPLAY · historical
Nine-axis profile
9-axis profile · today
Shape of the risk surface
1 landlord · 10 tenant
Sub-scores · with sparkline
Where the score comes from
1 → 10 scale
Local political climate
GOP margin +28.0% (2024)
4.4
Regional political climate
County-weighted neighbor mix
4.4
State political climate
Missouri legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
12.7% poverty · 2.3% unemp.
3.6
Supply constraint
$840 average · 16.3% renters
2.9
Rent Control risk
19.2% of income on rent
1.2
Eviction process difficulty
43 days filing → judgment
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
16.3% renters
2.9
Housing court bias
County bench composition
1.5
Geographic context
Risk heat across Faucett and the region
Click any city to see its score
How Faucett compares
Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Buchanan County
Low
#5of 7 cities
#5 of 7 cities in Buchanan County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Missouri
Low
#836of 1,082 cities
#836 of 1,082 cities in Missouri for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Score story
Six-stop tour of the risk profile
2
/ 10 · VERY LOW
The verdict
A Very low-tier market.
Composite 2/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.
50-yr trend-0.5 over 50 yr
197620012026
Steady ratchet · no large swings
43d
Typical timeline
The money
What renting (and evicting) looks like.
Rent published at $840/mo. A contested eviction takes 43 days and costs $1,056–$3,173 per case.
50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
197620012026
Court-clerk data lands in the next release.
16.3%
Renters
The renters
Who you'll be renting to.
Out of 114 residents, 16.3% rent. 19% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 12.7% below the poverty line.
50-yr trendRenter share rising
197620012026
ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.
4.4
Local + regional
The politics
Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.
Local & regional political climate score 4.4 and 4.4 (GOP margin +28.0% (2024)). State climate at 2.1, a mid-range statehouse.
50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
197620012026
Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.
2.1
State politics
The process
Moderate calendar, moderate friction.
State political climate 2.1/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.7, housing court bias 1.5, rent-control risk 1.2. Standard process speed for the state.
50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.3 since '00
197620012026
Court-clerk data lands in the next release.
3.6
Economic stress
The stress
Economic pressure is the background risk.
Economic stress: 3.6. Supply constraint: 2.9. The numbers behind those: 12.7% poverty, 2.3% unemployment, 19% of income on rent.
50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
197620012026
Mirrors BLS unemployment series.
US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost
Faucett sits in the quick & cheap quadrant
Bubble size = population · color = risk score
Faucett · 43d · ~$2.1k all-in ($49/day) · score 2National average: 58d · $4.6k all-inHover any bubble for stats · click to openColor: 0–4 4–7 7–10
Landlording in Faucett, Missouri, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.
Faucett is a city of 114 residents where 16.3% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 19.2% of income on rent. At an average rent of $840/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.
01Process
How Faucett eviction process actually works
Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.7/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Faucett closes 43 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.
The slow part of Faucett's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 1.5/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.
02Cost
What it costs (and how long it takes)
An all-in eviction in Faucett runs $1,056 to $3,173 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.
For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 43 days of typical timeline and $840/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.
03Operations
Security deposits, screening, and lease terms
Tenant organizing strength scores 2.9/10 in Faucett, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1.2/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:
Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Missouri, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy
What an everyday landlord should actually do here
If you own one to four units in Faucett: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.
The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Missouri's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $3,173 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.
04bPractical traps
Local traps to avoid in Faucett
Trap · MISSOURI
For state-level context, see the Missouri overview link in the guides section below. The score combines political climate, rent-to-income ratio, court bias, and tenant organizing strength under RSMo 535.
04Eviction filings
Live filings tracking · Eviction Lab
Princeton Eviction Lab Tracking System, state-level (no county tracker available). Last update 2026-05-01.
In the most recent month, 3,285 eviction cases were filed across the tracker's coverage area, 0.88× the historical baseline (below baseline). Past 12 months: 44,239 filings. Pandemic-era cumulative: 244,075.
3,285Past month
44,239Past 12 months
0.88×vs baseline (past mo)
18.2%Repeat-tenant filings
Notice requirement: at least ten days notice (for nonpayment of rent cases, though in other cases more). Filing fee: minimum filing fee of $33.
Last 36 months of filings2023-05-01 – 2026-04-01
Filings dropped 10% over the past 12 months.
Source: Eviction Lab Tracking System, Princeton University. Open Data Commons Attribution license.
05FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Q1
Can I evict a tenant in Faucett without a reason?
Missouri does not have a statewide just-cause eviction requirement. For month-to-month tenancies, you can generally terminate the lease with a 30-day notice without needing to state a specific reason. For fixed-term leases, you'd need a lease violation or the term to expire.
Q2
How long does a Faucett eviction typically take?
On average, a Faucett eviction takes about 43 days from serving the initial notice to the final lockout. This can vary based on court schedules and tenant actions.
Q3
What are the common mistakes Faucett landlords make during eviction?
The most common mistakes include improper notice (wrong dates, incorrect amounts, bad service), accepting partial rent after serving notice, attempting self-help evictions (changing locks, shutting off utilities), and not having proper documentation for court.
Q4
Do I need an attorney for an eviction in Buchanan County?
While not legally required for every case, hiring an attorney is highly recommended, especially if the tenant contests the eviction or you're unsure about the process. They can prevent costly mistakes and speed up the process. See our Buchanan County eviction guide for more local context.
Q5
What are the rules for security deposits in Faucett?
You can collect up to two months' rent as a security deposit. You must return it within 30 days of the tenant vacating, along with an itemized list of any deductions for damages beyond normal wear and tear.
Q6
Is rent control a risk for landlords in Faucett, MO?
No, Missouri has a statewide preemption against rent control, meaning local municipalities like Faucett cannot implement rent control policies. Your risk for rent control is low, reflected in the sub-score of 1.2/10. For more details, check the Missouri rent control rules.
===META_TITLE===
Faucett, MO Eviction Risk 4.1/10: Landlord's Practical Guide
===META_DESC===
Faucett, MO's 4.1/10 eviction risk score means a 5-day notice, 43-day timeline, and $1,056, $3,173 cost. Get your step-by-step landlord playbook here.
===INTRO_HTML===
Faucett, Missouri, a small community in Buchanan County with a population of just 114, presents a unique backdrop for landlords. With only 16.3% of occupied units being renter-occupied, the rental market here is tight-knit. You're not dealing with big city churn; instead, you're likely managing properties in a more stable, smaller-scale environment. This can be a double-edged sword: fewer tenants mean less competition for your units, but also potentially fewer options if a tenancy goes sideways. Our data gives Faucett an eviction risk score of 4.1/10, placing it in the moderate risk tier. This means while evictions aren't excessively difficult, you still need to know the specific playbook.
Understanding this 4.1/10 score is key. It's a composite of several factors, like the relatively low eviction-process-difficulty (1.7/10) and housing-court-bias (1.5/10), which are good news for landlords. However, factors like economic-stress (3.6/10) and tenant-organizing-strength (2.9/10) suggest you can't be completely hands-off. For the everyday landlord with a handful of units, this score signals that being prepared and following the rules precisely will save you a lot of headaches and money. Don't assume the small-town vibe means a casual approach to legalities.
A 2/10 places Faucett in the 26th percentile of Missouri cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.
Cities with similar eviction risk to Faucett (2/10)
Same risk band nationally · click any city for its full breakdown.
