Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Cushman Eviction Risk: Lower , Lincoln
Tract 31109003605 ·
Lancaster County, NE · pop 4,178 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
31109003605 is a census tract in the Cushman area of Lincoln, NE. It scores 3/10 for landlords. Population here is 4,178. The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3%Stable renters 5%Owners 92%
Tract context
Occupied units1,541
Renter share7.9%
SVI overall0.21
Poverty rate5.2%
Median income$99,269
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Cushman
Moderate
Within parent city
19th percentile
#62 of 76 tracts In Lincoln
Very Low
Within county
11th percentile
#72 of 81 tracts In Lancaster County
Very Low
Within state
35th percentile
#360 of 553 tracts In Nebraska
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Lincoln and the region
Centroid at 40.7612, -96.7040 · click any tract to drill in
Why Cushman scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lincoln
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
Nebraska legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
5.2% poverty · this tract
1.3
Supply constraint
$1,080 rent vs county FMR
4.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lincoln
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lincoln
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lincoln
3.0
How Cushman compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 21
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
35%Socioeconomic
22%Household composition
25%Racial/ethnic minority
21%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
175Total filings over 14 yrs
3.27%Avg annual filing rate
7.0%Peak (2010)
10Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year2002 to 2016
Filings climbed 43% over the past 14 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
7.8%Housing insecurity
5.2%Utility-shutoff threat
9.0%Food insecurity
6.2%SNAP enrollment
5.3%Transit barriers
7.6%No health insurance
13.7%Frequent mental distress
24.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Cushman
Running cool, economic stress reads 1.3/10. Cost burden runs 34% here against 43.9% across Lancaster County. On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.8/10.
SNAP participation runs 6.2% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 9.0% against 17.8% nationally.
Court records carry 175 eviction filings across 14 observed years. It sits 0.8 points below the Lancaster County average of 3.8. The worst year on record was 2010, when 7.0% of renter households were served.
In a typical year about 3.3% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 8% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Rent consumes only 13% of average household income of $99,269, an unusually wide affordability cushion.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 31109003605
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 31109003605?
Census tract 31109003605 in the Cushman neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 31109003605?
Median gross rent is $1,080/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 34% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 31109003605?
5.2% of residents in tract 31109003605 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,178.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 31109003605?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 21th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 35th, household 22th, minority 25th, housing 21th.
Q5
Is tract 31109003605 considered part of Cushman?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 31109003605 fall within Cushman (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 31109003605?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 175 eviction filings across 14 validated years in tract 31109003605 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.27% of renter households, peaking at 7.0% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 31109003605 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 31109003605 compare to Lincoln overall?
Tract 31109003605 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Lincoln at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lincoln eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Lincoln
Top eight tracts in Lincoln ranked by composite eviction-risk score.