Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #32,842 of 84,120 nationally
Kimco Industrial Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Lincoln
Tract 31109000400 · Lancaster County, NE · pop 5,891 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
Tract 31109000400 sits in the Kimco Industrial Park area of Lincoln eviction risk, NE, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5/10. It is home to 5,891 residents. Against Lancaster County at 43.9%, 63% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Risk score
5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 39%
Stable renters 23%
Owners 38%
Tract context
Occupied units2,114
Renter share61.4%
SVI overall0.88
Poverty rate35.6%
Median income$50,746
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
89
th percentile
High
Within county
88
th percentile
High
Within state
91
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Lincoln and the region
Centroid at 40.8298, -96.6825 · click any tract to drill in
Why Kimco Industrial Park scores 5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Lincoln
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
Nebraska legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
35.6% poverty · this tract
8.9
Supply constraint
$1,002 rent vs county FMR
3.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lincoln
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lincoln
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lincoln
3.0
How Kimco Industrial Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 88
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 92%Socioeconomic
- 82%Household composition
- 65%Racial/ethnic minority
- 69%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 10%Grade B
- 73%Grade C
- 8%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 1,012Total filings over 14 yrs
- 6.25%Avg annual filing rate
- 8.4%Peak (2006)
- 55Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 29% over the past 14 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 18.8%Housing insecurity
- 14.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 27.5%Food insecurity
- 24.5%SNAP enrollment
- 14.6%Transit barriers
- 15.8%No health insurance
- 19.7%Frequent mental distress
- 35.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Kimco Industrial Park
The severe-burden share is 29%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.
The poverty rate is 36%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. On the high side, economic stress reads 8.9/10. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.8/10.
It sits 1.2 points above the Lancaster County average of 3.8. Food insecurity runs 27.5% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 24.5% against 15.2% nationally.
Court records carry 1,012 eviction filings across 14 observed years. The worst year on record was 2006, when 8.4% of renter households were served.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 6.3% of renter households face a filing.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 31109000400
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 31109000400?
Census tract 31109000400 in the Kimco Industrial Park neighborhood scores 5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 31109000400?
Median gross rent is $1,002/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 63% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 31109000400?
35.6% of residents in tract 31109000400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,891.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 31109000400?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 88th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 92th, household 82th, minority 65th, housing 69th.
Q5
Is tract 31109000400 considered part of Kimco Industrial Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 31109000400 fall within Kimco Industrial Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 31109000400?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,012 eviction filings across 14 validated years in tract 31109000400 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.25% of renter households, peaking at 8.4% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 31109000400 struggle to pay rent?
About 18.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 31109000400 compare to Lincoln overall?
Tract 31109000400 scores 5/10, higher than the parent city of Lincoln at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lincoln eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 31109000400 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 8% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Lincoln
Top eight tracts in Lincoln ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · NE
H.J.B. Industrial Park
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
Cather
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
North Lincoln
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
Hillsdale
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
North Lincoln
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
Telegraph District
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
Makers Row
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NE
WJ Marshalls
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Related