Cather Eviction Risk: Moderate , Lincoln
Tract 31109000300 · Lancaster County, NE · pop 4,113 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi
31109000300 is a census tract in the Cather area of Lincoln, NE. It scores 5/10 for landlords. 25% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly below the Lancaster County average of 43.9%.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Lincoln and the region
Centroid at 40.8419, -96.6611 · click any tract to drill in
Why Cather scores 5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Cather compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 70
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 68%Socioeconomic
- 56%Household composition
- 42%Racial/ethnic minority
- 76%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 17%Grade B
- 76%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 700Total filings over 14 yrs
- 4.64%Avg annual filing rate
- 6.0%Peak (2008)
- 57Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 12.5%Housing insecurity
- 8.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 16.7%Food insecurity
- 13.3%SNAP enrollment
- 9.1%Transit barriers
- 11.3%No health insurance
- 16.9%Frequent mental distress
- 29.1%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Cather
Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. 76% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.
On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.8/10. At $826 a month, rents run 24% under what the rest of Lincoln commands.
Severe burden reaches 14%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. It sits 1.2 points above the Lancaster County average of 3.8. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 2.3/10.
The poverty rate is 19%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Court records carry 700 eviction filings across 14 observed years.
Filings peaked in 2008 at 6.0% of renter households. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Lincoln. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 31109000300
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 31109000300?
What is the average rent in tract 31109000300?
What is the poverty rate in tract 31109000300?
How socially vulnerable is tract 31109000300?
Is tract 31109000300 considered part of Cather?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 31109000300?
What share of households in tract 31109000300 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 31109000300 compare to Lincoln overall?
Was tract 31109000300 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Lincoln
Top eight tracts in Lincoln ranked by composite eviction-risk score.