Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #32,842 of 84,120 nationally

Telegraph District Eviction Risk: Moderate , Lincoln

Tract 31109001800 · Lancaster County, NE · pop 2,336 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

Census tract 31109001800 covers part of the Telegraph District area of Lincoln, NE, and scores 5/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 2,336 residents. 62% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well above the Lancaster County average of 43.9%.

Risk score
5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 55% Stable renters 34% Owners 11%
Tract context
Occupied units1,237
Renter share89.4%
SVI overall0.73
Poverty rate49.4%
Median income$28,285

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Telegraph District
Moderate
Within parent city
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#14 of 76 tracts In Lincoln
High
Within county
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 81 tracts In Lancaster County
Very High
Within state
91 th percentile
Rank, 91st percentileLowHigh
#49 of 553 tracts In Nebraska
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lincoln and the region

Centroid at 40.8118, -96.6889 · click any tract to drill in

Why Telegraph District scores 5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lincoln
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
Nebraska legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
49.4% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$768 rent vs county FMR
1.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lincoln
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lincoln
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lincoln
3.0

How Telegraph District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Telegraph District risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.0This tracttract 0018003.6Lincolnparent city3.8Countyavg tract in county3.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 73

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 541Total filings over 14 yrs
  • 5.50%Avg annual filing rate
  • 8.8%Peak (2007)
  • 31Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 31109001800
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 14 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Telegraph District

The score leans hardest on economic stress at 10/10. The poverty rate is 49%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

The severe-burden share is 32%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. This is renter territory: 89% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 1/10.

Annualized rent equals 33% of average household income of $28,285, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. Average gross rent is $768, 29% below the Lincoln average.

On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.8/10. Against the Lancaster County average of 3.8, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.2 points. Food insecurity runs 28.2% against 17.8% nationally.

The filing record is not thin: 541 evictions over 14 years of observation. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 14.5% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 31109001800

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 31109001800?

Census tract 31109001800 in the Telegraph District neighborhood scores 5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 31109001800?

Median gross rent is $768/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 62% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 31109001800?

49.4% of residents in tract 31109001800 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,336.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 31109001800?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 73th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 77th, household 28th, minority 52th, housing 86th.
Q5

Is tract 31109001800 considered part of Telegraph District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 31109001800 fall within Telegraph District (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 31109001800?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 541 eviction filings across 14 validated years in tract 31109001800 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.50% of renter households, peaking at 8.8% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 31109001800 struggle to pay rent?

About 18.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 31109001800 compare to Lincoln overall?

Tract 31109001800 scores 5/10, higher than the parent city of Lincoln at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lincoln eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 31109001800 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 17% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Lincoln

Top eight tracts in Lincoln ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related