Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #41,206 of 84,120 nationally

Hardenbergh's Eviction Risk: Moderate , Lincoln

Tract 31109002300 · Lancaster County, NE · pop 5,412 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

With a score of 4.5/10, tract 31109002300 in the Hardenbergh's area of Lincoln, NE reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.

Risk score
4.5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 22% Stable renters 26% Owners 52%
Tract context
Occupied units2,504
Renter share48.7%
SVI overall0.50
Poverty rate16.7%
Median income$68,205

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Hardenbergh's
Moderate
Within parent city
69 th percentile
Rank, 69th percentileLowHigh
#24 of 76 tracts In Lincoln
Elevated
Within county
71 th percentile
Rank, 71st percentileLowHigh
#24 of 81 tracts In Lancaster County
Elevated
Within state
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#113 of 553 tracts In Nebraska
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lincoln and the region

Centroid at 40.7930, -96.6879 · click any tract to drill in

Why Hardenbergh's scores 4.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lincoln
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
Nebraska legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
16.7% poverty · this tract
4.2
Supply constraint
$881 rent vs county FMR
2.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lincoln
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lincoln
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lincoln
3.0

How Hardenbergh's compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Hardenbergh's risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.5This tracttract 0023003.6Lincolnparent city3.8Countyavg tract in county3.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 50

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 813Total filings over 14 yrs
  • 4.88%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.9%Peak (2014)
  • 67Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 31109002300
Filings climbed 76% over the past 14 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Hardenbergh's

19% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.8/10.

Average gross rent is $881, 19% below the Lincoln average. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 2.8/10. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 813 filings here across 14 tracked years.

It sits 0.7 points above the Lancaster County average of 3.8. Filings peaked in 2014 at 5.9% of renter households.

This ground was mapped A ("Best") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Lincoln. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 4.9% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 51st percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 5.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Against average income of $68,205, annual rent is just 16%.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 31109002300

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 31109002300?

Census tract 31109002300 in the Hardenbergh's neighborhood scores 4.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 31109002300?

Median gross rent is $881/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 31109002300?

16.7% of residents in tract 31109002300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,412.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 31109002300?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 50th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 55th, household 46th, minority 33th, housing 51th.
Q5

Is tract 31109002300 considered part of Hardenbergh's?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 31109002300 fall within Hardenbergh's (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 31109002300?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 813 eviction filings across 14 validated years in tract 31109002300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.88% of renter households, peaking at 5.9% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 31109002300 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 31109002300 compare to Lincoln overall?

Tract 31109002300 scores 4.5/10, higher than the parent city of Lincoln at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lincoln eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 31109002300 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Lincoln

Top eight tracts in Lincoln ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related