Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #68,306 of 84,120 nationally

Sutherland Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Lincoln

Tract 31109003601 · Lancaster County, NE · pop 1,166 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

In Sutherland Park in Lincoln, census tract 31109003601 scores $1/10 for eviction risk. That is riskier than about 12% of US census tracts.

Risk score
2.4
Lower
Confidence 45% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0% Stable renters 0% Owners 100%
Tract context
SVI overall-10.00

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Sutherland Park
Moderate
Within parent city
9 th percentile
Rank, 9th percentileLowHigh
#69 of 76 tracts In Lincoln
Very Low
Within county
15 th percentile
Rank, 15th percentileLowHigh
#69 of 81 tracts In Lancaster County
Very Low
Within state
22 th percentile
Rank, 22nd percentileLowHigh
#434 of 553 tracts In Nebraska
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lincoln and the region

Centroid at 40.7700, -96.7038 · click any tract to drill in

Why Sutherland Park scores 2.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lincoln
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
Nebraska legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
this tract poverty rate
3.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lincoln
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lincoln
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lincoln
3.0

How Sutherland Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Sutherland Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.42.4This tracttract 003601Lincoln: 3.13.1Lincolnparent cityCounty: 3.63.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.43.4Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: -1,000

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 2Total filings over 2 yrs
  • 0.00%Avg annual filing rate
  • 0.0%Peak (2007)
  • 1Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 311090036012002: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2003: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2005: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2006: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2007: 1 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2008: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2009: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2010: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2011: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2012: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2013: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2014: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2015: 1 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2016: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Sutherland Park

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lincoln eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Lancaster County average of 4.4 and in line with the Nebraska statewide average of 3.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is White and Black and ranks around the 1000th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

In CDC survey modeling, about 16.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 10.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 31109003601

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 31109003601?

Census tract 31109003601 in the Sutherland Park neighborhood scores 2.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

How socially vulnerable is tract 31109003601?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the -1000th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic -1000th, household -1000th, minority 68th, housing -1000th.
Q3

Is tract 31109003601 considered part of Sutherland Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 31109003601 fall within Sutherland Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q4

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 31109003601?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 2 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 31109003601 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.00% of renter households, peaking at 0.0% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q5

What share of households in tract 31109003601 struggle to pay rent?

About 16.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 31109003601 compare to Lincoln overall?

Tract 31109003601 scores 2.4/10, lower than the parent city of Lincoln at 3.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lincoln eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Lincoln

Top eight tracts in Lincoln ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related