Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #32,842 of 84,120 nationally

Struwe Eviction Risk: Moderate , Lincoln

Tract 31109003103 · Lancaster County, NE · pop 2,752 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

With a score of 5/10, tract 31109003103 in the Struwe area of Lincoln, NE reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,752. Against Lancaster County at 43.9%, 62% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 33% Stable renters 21% Owners 46%
Tract context
Occupied units914
Renter share54.0%
SVI overall0.94
Poverty rate22.8%
Median income$56,875

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Struwe
Moderate
Within parent city
97 th percentile
Rank, 97th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 76 tracts In Lincoln
Very High
Within county
96 th percentile
Rank, 96th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 81 tracts In Lancaster County
Very High
Within state
91 th percentile
Rank, 91st percentileLowHigh
#49 of 553 tracts In Nebraska
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lincoln and the region

Centroid at 40.8460, -96.7164 · click any tract to drill in

Why Struwe scores 5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lincoln
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
Nebraska legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
22.8% poverty · this tract
5.7
Supply constraint
$1,328 rent vs county FMR
6.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lincoln
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lincoln
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lincoln
3.0

How Struwe compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Struwe risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.0This tracttract 0031033.6Lincolnparent city3.8Countyavg tract in county3.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 94

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 486Total filings over 14 yrs
  • 10.83%Avg annual filing rate
  • 20.8%Peak (2014)
  • 24Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 31109003103
Filings dropped 35% over the past 14 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Struwe

The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. Severe burden reaches 26%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Running cool, state political climate reads 1.8/10. At $1,328 a month, rents run 22% over what the rest of Lincoln commands.

The poverty rate is 23%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Against the Lancaster County average of 3.8, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.2 points. Food insecurity runs 28.2% against 17.8% nationally.

The voucher gap is 18.0%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. SNAP participation runs 25.1% against 15.2% nationally.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 486 filings here across 14 tracked years. On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 3/10.

The worst year on record was 2014, when 20.8% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 31109003103

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 31109003103?

Census tract 31109003103 in the Struwe neighborhood scores 5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 31109003103?

Median gross rent is $1,328/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 62% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 31109003103?

22.8% of residents in tract 31109003103 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,752.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 31109003103?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 94th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 93th, household 97th, minority 48th, housing 82th.
Q5

Is tract 31109003103 considered part of Struwe?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 31109003103 fall within Struwe (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 31109003103?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 486 eviction filings across 14 validated years in tract 31109003103 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 10.83% of renter households, peaking at 20.8% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 31109003103 struggle to pay rent?

About 19.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 31109003103 compare to Lincoln overall?

Tract 31109003103 scores 5/10, higher than the parent city of Lincoln at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lincoln eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 31109003103 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Lincoln

Top eight tracts in Lincoln ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related