All Counties in North Carolina, Eviction Risk 2026
100 counties covering 774 incorporated cities and 6,708,192 residents. Statewide average landlord risk score is 3.8/10 (Low), but county-level scores vary sharply, urban counties with strong tenant protections or high rent burdens routinely score several points above rural counties.
| County↕ | Population↕ | Risk↕ | Lean↕ | Renters↕ | % income on rent↕ | Avg rent↕ | Poverty↕ | Cities↕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Washington County | 3,851 | 5.3 | Dem | 49.9% | 44.7% | $696 | 37.9% | 3 |
| 02 | Scotland County | 18,791 | 4.7 | IND | 44.2% | 34.8% | $771 | 33.8% | 7 |
| 03 | Tyrrell County | 759 | 4.6 | Rep | 50.7% | 42.1% | $678 | 35.3% | 1 |
| 04 | Halifax County | 25,294 | 4.5 | Dem | 40.6% | 32.6% | $721 | 30.0% | 9 |
| 05 | Greene County | 4,663 | 4.4 | Rep | 44.7% | 37.8% | $790 | 33.5% | 4 |
| 06 | Richmond County | 21,864 | 4.3 | Rep | 43.1% | 36.2% | $670 | 34.0% | 9 |
| 07 | Pitt County | 119,772 | 4.3 | Dem | 40.8% | 35.5% | $944 | 21.3% | 13 |
| 08 | Hertford County | 8,950 | 4.3 | Dem | 41.6% | 38.7% | $888 | 23.0% | 5 |
| 09 | Jackson County | 12,434 | 4.3 | Rep | 48.2% | 29.7% | $1,007 | 25.6% | 7 |
| 10 | Transylvania County | 8,596 | 4.3 | Rep | 61.1% | 24.1% | $923 | 19.8% | 2 |
| 11 | Anson County | 10,118 | 4.2 | IND | 37.3% | 29.8% | $925 | 30.9% | 7 |
| 12 | Durham County | 293,613 | 4.2 | Dem | 44.0% | 31.0% | $2,106 | 14.3% | 3 |
| 13 | Vance County | 16,064 | 4.2 | Dem | 41.3% | 38.9% | $917 | 32.6% | 4 |
| 14 | Mitchell County | 3,145 | 4.2 | Rep | 36.6% | 34.1% | $670 | 17.9% | 2 |
| 15 | Ashe County | 3,465 | 4.1 | Rep | 48.7% | 31.4% | $728 | 15.5% | 3 |
| 16 | Warren County | 1,925 | 4.1 | Dem | 38.7% | 35.6% | $842 | 17.7% | 3 |
| 17 | Franklin County | 12,755 | 4.1 | Rep | 34.3% | 33.9% | $1,082 | 13.6% | 6 |
| 18 | Perquimans County | 2,315 | 4.1 | Rep | 41.7% | 26.4% | $885 | 19.0% | 2 |
| 19 | Edgecombe County | 15,575 | 4.0 | Dem | 41.0% | 35.3% | $903 | 22.9% | 9 |
| 20 | Orange County | 94,146 | 4.0 | Dem | 39.3% | 41.7% | $1,327 | 10.3% | 4 |
| 21 | Chowan County | 6,809 | 4.0 | Rep | 22.5% | 24.9% | $661 | 31.5% | 5 |
| 22 | Alleghany County | 1,928 | 4.0 | Rep | 41.8% | 31.1% | $563 | 21.2% | 1 |
| 23 | Cherokee County | 4,074 | 4.0 | Rep | 38.2% | 21.9% | $693 | 17.0% | 3 |
| 24 | Cumberland County | 248,435 | 4.0 | Dem | 33.5% | 33.4% | $1,088 | 17.5% | 9 |
| 25 | Yancey County | 2,082 | 4.0 | Rep | 51.4% | 25.9% | $862 | 25.5% | 1 |
| 26 | Harnett County | 62,198 | 4.0 | Rep | 33.2% | 30.1% | $1,115 | 14.2% | 11 |
| 27 | Montgomery County | 8,681 | 4.0 | Rep | 44.5% | 28.4% | $804 | 24.6% | 5 |
| 28 | Northampton County | 5,830 | 4.0 | Dem | 32.3% | 31.6% | $745 | 21.8% | 11 |
| 29 | Mecklenburg County | 1.09M | 4.0 | Dem | 33.0% | 29.6% | $1,666 | 7.6% | 7 |
| 30 | Johnston County | 67,195 | 4.0 | Rep | 36.8% | 32.5% | $1,020 | 19.9% | 10 |
| 31 | Martin County | 8,130 | 4.0 | IND | 43.8% | 26.6% | $763 | 17.9% | 9 |
| 32 | Duplin County | 13,468 | 4.0 | Rep | 39.6% | 30.9% | $701 | 23.2% | 12 |
| 33 | Beaufort County | 18,788 | 3.9 | Rep | 28.2% | 34.2% | $935 | 17.6% | 11 |
| 34 | Wilson County | 57,575 | 3.9 | IND | 37.0% | 30.7% | $903 | 19.3% | 10 |
| 35 | Bertie County | 5,014 | 3.9 | Dem | 25.8% | 37.4% | $749 | 19.8% | 6 |
| 36 | Macon County | 5,342 | 3.9 | Rep | 37.3% | 21.3% | $687 | 17.2% | 2 |
| 37 | Madison County | 4,553 | 3.9 | Rep | 43.0% | 30.4% | $765 | 14.3% | 3 |
| 38 | Rockingham County | 38,793 | 3.9 | Rep | 34.6% | 27.0% | $785 | 16.4% | 7 |
| 39 | Wayne County | 55,047 | 3.9 | Rep | 33.0% | 29.5% | $965 | 22.4% | 12 |
| 40 | Polk County | 3,686 | 3.9 | Rep | 35.0% | 28.5% | $1,239 | 20.0% | 4 |
| 41 | Wake County | 988,194 | 3.9 | Dem | 30.9% | 29.2% | $1,606 | 5.9% | 12 |
| 42 | Lenoir County | 24,271 | 3.9 | IND | 43.6% | 23.6% | $750 | 24.1% | 6 |
| 43 | Watauga County | 25,108 | 3.9 | Dem | 28.5% | 37.0% | $1,199 | 21.3% | 6 |
| 44 | Granville County | 23,460 | 3.9 | Rep | 27.2% | 25.0% | $1,096 | 13.3% | 5 |
| 45 | Caswell County | 2,348 | 3.9 | Rep | 33.1% | 35.5% | $801 | 30.4% | 2 |
| 46 | Iredell County | 99,890 | 3.9 | Rep | 32.5% | 28.9% | $1,185 | 12.7% | 6 |
| 47 | Jones County | 2,308 | 3.9 | Rep | 38.3% | 30.3% | $864 | 19.0% | 4 |
| 48 | Columbus County | 14,809 | 3.8 | Rep | 38.7% | 27.8% | $853 | 24.1% | 11 |
| 49 | Randolph County | 58,248 | 3.8 | Rep | 37.3% | 29.6% | $848 | 19.5% | 9 |
| 50 | Robeson County | 37,829 | 3.8 | Rep | 36.2% | 34.7% | $828 | 25.2% | 23 |
| 51 | Surry County | 23,293 | 3.8 | Rep | 36.7% | 28.5% | $782 | 15.2% | 8 |
| 52 | Catawba County | 101,255 | 3.8 | Rep | 32.1% | 29.3% | $983 | 14.5% | 11 |
| 53 | Bladen County | 9,668 | 3.8 | Rep | 34.2% | 37.0% | $759 | 22.1% | 10 |
| 54 | New Hanover County | 214,390 | 3.8 | IND | 24.0% | 31.5% | $1,523 | 11.7% | 17 |
| 55 | Craven County | 74,699 | 3.8 | Rep | 25.7% | 32.3% | $1,217 | 15.5% | 12 |
| 56 | Person County | 8,885 | 3.8 | Rep | 32.5% | 41.3% | $1,026 | 18.0% | 2 |
| 57 | Rowan County | 60,960 | 3.7 | Rep | 27.8% | 28.1% | $927 | 15.6% | 11 |
| 58 | Buncombe County | 136,599 | 3.7 | Dem | 25.2% | 33.6% | $1,422 | 8.8% | 12 |
| 59 | Lee County | 33,313 | 3.7 | Rep | 37.6% | 36.9% | $1,021 | 19.9% | 3 |
| 60 | Nash County | 67,910 | 3.7 | IND | 32.7% | 26.6% | $847 | 19.5% | 9 |
| 61 | Wilkes County | 18,687 | 3.7 | Rep | 34.6% | 27.2% | $712 | 16.5% | 9 |
| 62 | Yadkin County | 9,176 | 3.7 | Rep | 36.9% | 30.7% | $730 | 24.9% | 6 |
| 63 | Onslow County | 111,036 | 3.7 | Rep | 24.4% | 26.7% | $1,253 | 9.5% | 10 |
| 64 | Clay County | 1,208 | 3.7 | Rep | 40.9% | 20.0% | $499 | 24.2% | 1 |
| 65 | Gaston County | 155,706 | 3.7 | Rep | 32.8% | 27.4% | $1,173 | 11.3% | 15 |
| 66 | Haywood County | 22,979 | 3.7 | Rep | 30.9% | 33.8% | $1,053 | 10.3% | 6 |
| 67 | Hyde County | 1,436 | 3.7 | Rep | 30.5% | 36.2% | $1,169 | 20.4% | 4 |
| 68 | McDowell County | 11,096 | 3.7 | Rep | 36.7% | 30.3% | $819 | 18.4% | 5 |
| 69 | Pasquotank County | 18,871 | 3.7 | IND | 55.9% | 31.4% | $1,117 | 10.3% | 1 |
| 70 | Burke County | 37,025 | 3.7 | Rep | 30.1% | 25.7% | $812 | 16.0% | 9 |
| 71 | Graham County | 670 | 3.7 | Rep | 26.8% | 37.9% | $620 | 23.4% | 3 |
| 72 | Stanly County | 29,369 | 3.7 | Rep | 25.9% | 30.4% | $893 | 11.4% | 11 |
| 73 | Cleveland County | 45,399 | 3.7 | Rep | 26.6% | 31.1% | $897 | 18.9% | 17 |
| 74 | Forsyth County | 328,012 | 3.7 | Dem | 28.3% | 27.2% | $1,184 | 11.6% | 8 |
| 75 | Davie County | 12,084 | 3.6 | Rep | 24.0% | 26.5% | $955 | 12.5% | 5 |
| 76 | Stokes County | 11,347 | 3.6 | Rep | 25.2% | 34.6% | $845 | 13.5% | 5 |
| 77 | Moore County | 65,192 | 3.6 | Rep | 25.6% | 30.0% | $1,244 | 10.0% | 13 |
| 78 | Camden County | 1,345 | 3.6 | Rep | 39.5% | 20.2% | $1,165 | 2.9% | 2 |
| 79 | Davidson County | 65,843 | 3.6 | Rep | 23.4% | 26.5% | $789 | 14.7% | 9 |
| 80 | Gates County | 767 | 3.6 | Rep | 24.7% | 22.3% | $1,058 | 15.3% | 3 |
| 81 | Sampson County | 17,451 | 3.6 | Rep | 29.5% | 31.7% | $842 | 19.4% | 17 |
| 82 | Dare County | 26,262 | 3.6 | Rep | 26.7% | 33.5% | $1,261 | 9.2% | 14 |
| 83 | Rutherford County | 19,312 | 3.6 | Rep | 34.4% | 25.8% | $755 | 16.8% | 10 |
| 84 | Henderson County | 68,350 | 3.6 | Rep | 26.0% | 25.6% | $1,153 | 14.0% | 16 |
| 85 | Alamance County | 134,711 | 3.6 | Rep | 26.7% | 30.9% | $1,096 | 11.8% | 14 |
| 86 | Avery County | 4,283 | 3.5 | Rep | 24.2% | 29.1% | $935 | 11.8% | 8 |
| 87 | Brunswick County | 82,666 | 3.5 | Rep | 14.6% | 34.0% | $1,259 | 9.2% | 20 |
| 88 | Caldwell County | 41,623 | 3.5 | Rep | 26.1% | 29.3% | $831 | 12.3% | 9 |
| 89 | Union County | 174,712 | 3.5 | Rep | 18.1% | 31.2% | $1,595 | 10.4% | 15 |
| 90 | Carteret County | 36,394 | 3.5 | Rep | 22.5% | 32.7% | $1,235 | 10.2% | 17 |
| 91 | Currituck County | 9,141 | 3.5 | Rep | 20.0% | 37.5% | $1,483 | 8.9% | 4 |
| 92 | Hoke County | 10,191 | 3.5 | Dem | 26.2% | 37.2% | $996 | 31.1% | 8 |
| 93 | Pender County | 21,367 | 3.5 | Rep | 19.0% | 32.1% | $1,205 | 17.0% | 10 |
| 94 | Cabarrus County | 199,172 | 3.5 | Rep | 22.1% | 29.2% | $1,483 | 7.4% | 6 |
| 95 | Chatham County | 26,914 | 3.5 | Dem | 21.9% | 25.3% | $1,547 | 7.1% | 9 |
| 96 | Swain County | 3,986 | 3.5 | Rep | 44.0% | 24.5% | $977 | 23.4% | 3 |
| 97 | Pamlico County | 5,033 | 3.5 | Rep | 24.2% | 32.0% | $1,028 | 15.4% | 10 |
| 98 | Lincoln County | 25,411 | 3.4 | Rep | 24.4% | 31.5% | $1,157 | 7.3% | 6 |
| 99 | Alexander County | 7,964 | 3.4 | Rep | 18.3% | 24.3% | $719 | 18.2% | 4 |
| 100 | Guilford County | 457,397 | 3.3 | Dem | 16.1% | 27.5% | $1,463 | 9.4% | 11 |
Understanding county eviction risk in North Carolina
North Carolina's 100 counties span eviction-risk scores from 3.3 in Guilford County to 5.3 in Washington County , a 2.0-point gap that captures how unevenly rent burdens, renter populations, and local tenant politics are distributed across the state. The statewide average sits at 3.8/10 (Low), but that single figure hides far more than it reveals, the table above scores every county on the same 1–10 scale so you can see exactly where landlord exposure concentrates.
The counties carrying the most eviction risk, Washington County, Scotland County, Tyrrell County, are North Carolina's denser, higher-cost markets. In Washington County, renters spend an average of 45% of household income on rent, and 50% of its homes are renter-occupied, the cost pressure that pushes filings up and pulls tenant-protection ordinances into local politics. Larger metros also concentrate the legal-aid networks and renter-organizing capacity that lift a county's score above the rural baseline.
At the other end of the table, Guilford County, Alexander County, Lincoln County score lowest. These tend to be smaller, more rural counties where homeownership is the norm, rent-to-income ratios run lower, and local rent-control or just-cause ordinances are rare or state-preempted. Evictions still happen there, but the structural pressure that drives a high score (heavy rent burden, a large renter majority, organized tenant advocacy) is simply weaker.
Each county score is a population-weighted aggregate of every city scored inside it, so a county with one expensive urban core and a dozen quiet suburbs lands somewhere in between. Click any county row to drill into its cities ranked one by one, a zoomed heat map, and a full breakdown of rent burden, renter share, poverty rate, and political margin. For the statutes that apply statewide regardless of county, notice periods, security-deposit caps, just-cause and rent-control rules, see the North Carolina state overview.