Skip to content
Coats, North Carolina eviction risk overview
City brief · 1,664 residents

Coats, NC Eviction Risk: LOW

Harnett County · Population 1,664

In 2026
Risk score
2.8
LOW

81th percentile, North Carolina.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.6 Average2.2 Now2.8
3.4 1.6 1976 · score 2.4 1977 · score 2.4 1978 · score 2.3 1979 · score 2.4 1980 · score 2.4 1981 · score 2.4 1982 · score 2.5 1983 · score 2.4 1984 · score 2.2 1985 · score 1.7 1986 · score 1.7 1987 · score 1.6 1988 · score 1.6 1989 · score 1.6 1990 · score 1.6 1991 · score 1.7 1992 · score 1.9 1993 · score 1.9 1994 · score 1.9 1995 · score 1.9 1996 · score 1.8 1997 · score 1.8 1998 · score 1.8 1999 · score 1.8 2000 · score 1.8 2001 · score 1.9 2002 · score 2.0 2003 · score 2.0 2004 · score 1.9 2005 · score 1.9 2006 · score 1.9 2007 · score 1.9 2008 · score 2.3 2009 · score 2.6 2010 · score 2.6 2011 · score 2.7 2012 · score 2.6 2013 · score 2.5 2014 · score 2.4 2015 · score 2.4 2016 · score 2.3 2017 · score 2.4 2018 · score 2.4 2019 · score 2.4 2020 · score 3.2 2021 · score 3.4 2022 · score 2.6 2023 · score 2.6 2024 · score 2.7 2025 · score 2.8 2026 · score 2.8

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 4.5 Regional 4.5 State 2.3 Economic 8.0 Supply 6.9 Rent Control 7.3 Eviction 1.9 Tenant 9.2 Housing 7.9 2.8 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +25.1% (2024)
    4.5
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    4.5
  3. State political climate
    North Carolina legislature & governorship
    2.3
  4. Economic stress
    24.1% poverty · 6.2% unemp.
    8.0
  5. Supply constraint
    $909 average · 51.6% renters
    6.9
  6. Rent Control risk
    34.5% of income on rent
    7.3
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    45 days filing → judgment
    1.9
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    51.6% renters
    9.2
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    7.9
Geographic context

Risk heat across Coats and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Coats compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Harnett County
Very High
#2 of 11 cities
Rank in county, 90th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 11 cities in Harnett County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in North Carolina
High
#160 of 774 cities
Rank in state, 79th percentileLowHigh
#160 of 774 cities in North Carolina for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Coats risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Coats: 2.82.8CoatsThis cityCounty: 2.62.6Countyavg in countyState: 2.92.9Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.8
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 2.8/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.4 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 45d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $909/mo. A contested eviction takes 45 days and costs $1,508–$4,135 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 51.6%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 1,664 residents, 51.6% rent. 35% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 24.1% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 4.5
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 4.5 and 4.5 (GOP margin +25.1% (2024)). State climate at 2.3, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 2.3
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 2.3/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.9, housing court bias 7.9, rent-control risk 7.3. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.1 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 8
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the real risk.

    Economic stress: 8. Supply constraint: 6.9. The numbers behind those: 24.1% poverty, 6.2% unemployment, 35% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Coats sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Raleigh, NC · 45d · ~$3.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.3 Raleigh Durham, NC · 45d · ~$2.7k all-in ($60/day) · score 3.4 Durham Fayetteville, NC · 48d · ~$2.8k all-in ($59/day) · score 3 Fayetteville Cary, NC · 46d · ~$2.8k all-in ($61/day) · score 2.6 Cary Apex, NC · 45d · ~$2.6k all-in ($58/day) · score 2.4 Apex Chapel Hill, NC · 42d · ~$2.9k all-in ($68/day) · score 3.4 Chapel Hill Wake Forest, NC · 47d · ~$3.3k all-in ($70/day) · score 2.6 Wake Forest Charlotte, NC · 43d · ~$2.9k all-in ($68/day) · score 3.2 Charlotte Greensboro, NC · 44d · ~$2.7k all-in ($61/day) · score 3.2 Greensboro Winston-Salem, NC · 48d · ~$3.2k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Winston-Salem Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Coats
Coats · 45d · ~$2.8k all-in ($63/day) · score 2.8 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Coats, NC

Landlording in Coats, North Carolina, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.8/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Coats is a city of 1,664 residents where 51.6% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 34.5% of income on rent. At an average rent of $909/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Coats eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.9/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Coats closes 45 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Coats's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 7.9/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Coats runs $1,508 to $4,135 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 45 days of typical timeline and $909/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 9.2/10 in Coats, and the city carries meaningful rent control exposure (7.3/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In North Carolina, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Coats: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match North Carolina's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $4,135 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Coats

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
Compare Coats to neighboring cities in Harnett County via the grid below. The 5.9/10 score is computed from nine sub-factors plus a state-law multiplier under NCGS 42-26. Harnett County 2020 presidential margin: R+22.5. Cross-reference the state overview link in the guides section for North Carolina statutory detail.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant for being a few days late on rent in Coats?

No, not immediately. North Carolina law requires you to provide a 10-day pay-or-quit notice for non-payment of rent. This means the tenant has 10 days to pay the overdue rent in full or move out before you can file for eviction in court. You can't start the court process until that notice period has expired without compliance.

Q2

What's the fastest way to get a problem tenant out in Coats?

The fastest way is often through a mutual agreement like "cash for keys." If the tenant is willing to leave voluntarily in exchange for some money (e.g., to cover moving costs), it can save you weeks or months of eviction proceedings and legal fees. If that's not an option, promptly serving the correct legal notices and immediately filing in court once the notice period expires is the next fastest route, but expect around 45 days.

Q3

Do I need an attorney for an eviction in Coats?

While you can represent yourself in North Carolina small claims court for summary ejectment, it's highly recommended to consult or hire an attorney, especially given Coats' elevated housing-court-bias score of 7.9. An attorney ensures all legal procedures are followed correctly, increasing your chances of a successful and timely eviction and preventing costly mistakes.

Q4

How much notice do I need to give to end a month-to-month lease in Coats?

For a month-to-month tenancy without cause, North Carolina law (N.C.G.S. § 42-14) generally requires a 7-day notice to terminate. Always double-check your specific lease agreement, as some leases may specify a longer notice period, but 7 days is the statutory minimum. Ensure the notice is properly served.

Q5

Are there any tenant protections I should be aware of in North Carolina that could affect Coats?

North Carolina does not have statewide rent control or statewide source-of-income protection, which simplifies things for landlords compared to some other states. However, always be aware of fair housing laws, which prohibit discrimination based on protected classes. For more information, see our North Carolina tenant protections guide and our North Carolina rent control rules.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.8/10 places Coats in the 81st percentile of North Carolina cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.