Skip to content
Chardon, Ohio eviction risk overview
City brief · 5,249 residents

Chardon, OH Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Geauga County · Population 5,249

In 2026
Risk score
2.4
VERY LOW

55th percentile, Ohio.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.6 Average2.3 Now2.4
3.7 1.6 1976 · score 2.2 1977 · score 2.2 1978 · score 2.1 1979 · score 2.2 1980 · score 2.3 1981 · score 2.3 1982 · score 2.3 1983 · score 2.2 1984 · score 2.1 1985 · score 2.0 1986 · score 2.0 1987 · score 1.9 1988 · score 1.9 1989 · score 1.6 1990 · score 1.6 1991 · score 1.7 1992 · score 2.1 1993 · score 2.1 1994 · score 2.1 1995 · score 2.1 1996 · score 2.3 1997 · score 2.3 1998 · score 2.3 1999 · score 2.3 2000 · score 2.3 2001 · score 2.3 2002 · score 2.3 2003 · score 2.2 2004 · score 2.2 2005 · score 2.2 2006 · score 2.2 2007 · score 2.2 2008 · score 2.6 2009 · score 2.8 2010 · score 2.8 2011 · score 2.8 2012 · score 2.6 2013 · score 2.6 2014 · score 2.6 2015 · score 2.6 2016 · score 2.5 2017 · score 2.5 2018 · score 2.4 2019 · score 2.4 2020 · score 3.5 2021 · score 3.7 2022 · score 2.7 2023 · score 2.4 2024 · score 2.3 2025 · score 2.4 2026 · score 2.4

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 4.5 Regional 4.5 State 2.4 Economic 5.0 Supply 6.8 Rent Control 3.4 Eviction 2.2 Tenant 7.3 Housing 4.3 2.4 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +24.1% (2024)
    4.5
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    4.5
  3. State political climate
    Ohio legislature & governorship
    2.4
  4. Economic stress
    10.0% poverty · 3.0% unemp.
    5.0
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,163 average · 33.5% renters
    6.8
  6. Rent Control risk
    26.6% of income on rent
    3.4
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    45 days filing → judgment
    2.2
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    33.5% renters
    7.3
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    4.3
Geographic context

Risk heat across Chardon and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Chardon compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Geauga County
Moderate
#5 of 9 cities
Rank in county, 50th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 9 cities in Geauga County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Ohio
Moderate
#600 of 1,251 cities
Rank in state, 52nd percentileLowHigh
#600 of 1,251 cities in Ohio for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Chardon risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Chardon: 2.42.4ChardonThis cityCounty: 2.52.5Countyavg in countyState: 2.82.8Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.4
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2.4/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.2 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 45d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,163/mo. A contested eviction takes 45 days and costs $1,652–$3,489 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 33.5%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 5,249 residents, 33.5% rent. 27% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 10.0% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 4.5
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 4.5 and 4.5 (GOP margin +24.1% (2024)). State climate at 2.4, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 2.4
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 2.4/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2.2, housing court bias 4.3, rent-control risk 3.4. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-2.8 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 5
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 5. Supply constraint: 6.8. The numbers behind those: 10.0% poverty, 3.0% unemployment, 27% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Chardon sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Cleveland, OH · 39d · ~$3.1k all-in ($80/day) · score 3.7 Cleveland Akron, OH · 43d · ~$2.8k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.4 Akron Parma, OH · 42d · ~$2.9k all-in ($70/day) · score 2.8 Parma Youngstown, OH · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($71/day) · score 3.2 Youngstown Elyria, OH · 42d · ~$3.1k all-in ($73/day) · score 2.7 Elyria Cuyahoga Falls, OH · 39d · ~$2.8k all-in ($72/day) · score 2.5 Cuyahoga Falls Lakewood, OH · 40d · ~$2.4k all-in ($61/day) · score 2.7 Lakewood Columbus, OH · 38d · ~$2.7k all-in ($72/day) · score 3.1 Columbus Cincinnati, OH · 37d · ~$2.8k all-in ($75/day) · score 3.4 Cincinnati Toledo, OH · 45d · ~$3.0k all-in ($67/day) · score 3.3 Toledo Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Chardon
Chardon · 45d · ~$2.6k all-in ($57/day) · score 2.4 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Chardon, OH

Landlording in Chardon, Ohio, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.4/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Chardon is a city of 5,249 residents where 33.5% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 26.6% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,163/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Chardon eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2.2/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Chardon closes 45 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Chardon's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 4.3/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Chardon runs $1,652 to $3,489 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 45 days of typical timeline and $1,163/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 7.3/10 in Chardon, and the city has limited rent control exposure (3.4/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Ohio, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Chardon: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Ohio's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $3,489 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Chardon

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
Compare Chardon to neighboring cities in Geauga County via the grid below. The 3.9/10 score is computed from nine sub-factors plus a state-law multiplier under ORC 1923 + 5321. Geauga County 2020 presidential margin: R+23.1. Cross-reference the state overview link in the guides section for Ohio statutory detail.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What's the absolute fastest I can get a tenant out for non-payment in Chardon?

Theoretically, if you serve a 3-day notice immediately after rent is due and unpaid, and then file in court right after the notice expires, you might see a court date within 2-3 weeks. However, the typical timeline for the entire process, including court and sheriff involvement, is closer to 45 days. Don't expect to get a tenant out in under a month.

Q2

Can I just change the locks if my Chardon tenant stops paying?

Absolutely not. This is an illegal "self-help" eviction and can get you into serious legal trouble, including fines and damages owed to the tenant. You must follow the legal eviction process through the courts. Period.

Q3

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Geauga County?

While you can represent yourself, it's highly recommended to use an attorney, especially for your first eviction or if the tenant is contesting it. An attorney ensures proper procedure is followed, saving you time and money in the long run by preventing costly mistakes. The cost is usually worth the peace of mind.

Q4

What if my tenant claims I didn't fix something and that's why they're not paying rent?

Ohio law allows tenants to "repair and deduct" or withhold rent under very specific circumstances, but they must follow strict procedures, including giving you written notice and a reasonable time to make repairs. If they haven't followed those rules, their claim is likely not a valid defense against non-payment of rent in court. Document all repair requests and your responses.

Q5

Can I charge late fees in Chardon?

Yes, you can charge reasonable late fees as outlined in your lease agreement. Ohio law doesn't specify a maximum late fee, but courts generally consider fees that are punitive rather than compensatory to be unreasonable. Make sure your lease clearly states the amount and when it applies.

Q6

Is rent control a risk for Chardon landlords?

The rent-control-risk sub-score for Chardon is 2.4/10, which is low. Ohio has a state preemption against rent control, meaning local municipalities generally cannot enact their own rent control ordinances. So, while political climates can shift, statewide protections currently make rent control unlikely in Chardon.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.4/10 places Chardon in the 55th percentile of Ohio cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.