Skip to content
Little Mountain, South Carolina eviction risk overview
City brief · 368 residents

Little Mountain, SC Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Newberry County · Population 368

In 2026
Risk score
2.3
VERY LOW

36th percentile, South Carolina.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.9 Average2.4 Now2.3
3.3 1.9 1976 · score 3.0 1977 · score 3.0 1978 · score 2.9 1979 · score 2.9 1980 · score 3.0 1981 · score 3.0 1982 · score 3.1 1983 · score 2.9 1984 · score 2.7 1985 · score 2.6 1986 · score 2.2 1987 · score 2.1 1988 · score 2.0 1989 · score 1.9 1990 · score 1.9 1991 · score 1.9 1992 · score 2.2 1993 · score 2.3 1994 · score 2.2 1995 · score 2.2 1996 · score 2.2 1997 · score 2.2 1998 · score 2.1 1999 · score 2.2 2000 · score 2.1 2001 · score 2.1 2002 · score 2.1 2003 · score 2.1 2004 · score 2.1 2005 · score 2.0 2006 · score 2.0 2007 · score 2.0 2008 · score 2.4 2009 · score 2.6 2010 · score 2.7 2011 · score 2.7 2012 · score 2.6 2013 · score 2.5 2014 · score 2.5 2015 · score 2.5 2016 · score 2.4 2017 · score 2.3 2018 · score 2.3 2019 · score 2.3 2020 · score 3.1 2021 · score 3.3 2022 · score 2.5 2023 · score 2.5 2024 · score 2.4 2025 · score 2.3 2026 · score 2.3

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from constituent census tracts, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 4.4 Regional 4.4 State 2.1 Economic 4.8 Supply 4.3 Rent Control 5.6 Eviction 2.4 Tenant 4.3 Housing 6.0 2.3 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +34.3% (2024)
    4.4
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    4.4
  3. State political climate
    South Carolina legislature & governorship
    2.1
  4. Economic stress
    13.5% poverty · 0.9% unemp.
    4.8
  5. Supply constraint
    $795 average · 24.4% renters
    4.3
  6. Rent Control risk
    40.0% of income on rent
    5.6
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    38 days filing → judgment
    2.4
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    24.4% renters
    4.3
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    6.0
Geographic context

Risk heat across Little Mountain and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Little Mountain compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Newberry County
Very Low
#6 of 7 cities
Rank in county, 17th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 7 cities in Newberry County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in South Carolina
Low
#324 of 472 cities
Rank in state, 31st percentileLowHigh
#324 of 472 cities in South Carolina for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Little Mountain risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Little Mountain: 2.32.3Little MountainThis cityCounty: 2.62.6Countyavg in countyState: 2.52.5Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.3
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2.3/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend-0.7 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 38d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $795/mo. A contested eviction takes 38 days and costs $1,304–$4,337 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 24.4%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 368 residents, 24.4% rent. 40% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 13.5% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 4.4
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 4.4 and 4.4 (GOP margin +34.3% (2024)). State climate at 2.1, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 2.1
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 2.1/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2.4, housing court bias 6, rent-control risk 5.6. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-2.6 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 4.8
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 4.8. Supply constraint: 4.3. The numbers behind those: 13.5% poverty, 0.9% unemployment, 40% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Little Mountain sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Columbia, SC · 36d · ~$2.6k all-in ($71/day) · score 2.9 Columbia Charleston, SC · 36d · ~$2.9k all-in ($80/day) · score 2.6 Charleston North Charleston, SC · 37d · ~$2.6k all-in ($69/day) · score 2.6 North Charleston Mount Pleasant, SC · 41d · ~$2.4k all-in ($57/day) · score 2.2 Mount Pleasant Rock Hill, SC · 37d · ~$2.4k all-in ($65/day) · score 2.6 Rock Hill Greenville, SC · 36d · ~$2.6k all-in ($73/day) · score 2.4 Greenville Summerville, SC · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($70/day) · score 2.2 Summerville Charlotte, NC · 43d · ~$2.9k all-in ($68/day) · score 3.2 Charlotte Winston-Salem, NC · 48d · ~$3.2k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Winston-Salem Augusta, GA · 36d · ~$2.6k all-in ($72/day) · score 2.6 Augusta Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Little Mountain
Little Mountain · 38d · ~$2.8k all-in ($74/day) · score 2.3 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Little Mountain, SC

Landlording in Little Mountain, South Carolina, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.3/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Little Mountain is a city of 368 residents where 24.4% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 40.0% of income on rent. At an average rent of $795/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Little Mountain eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2.4/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Little Mountain closes 38 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Little Mountain's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 6/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Little Mountain runs $1,304 to $4,337 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 38 days of typical timeline and $795/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 4.3/10 in Little Mountain, and the city has limited rent control exposure (5.6/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In South Carolina, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Little Mountain: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match South Carolina's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $4,337 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Little Mountain

Trap · 24.4%
24.4% renter share against 368 residents produces roughly 90 rental occupants in Little Mountain. Newberry County voted R 24.1% in 2020. Eviction filings tend to cluster in the multifamily rental corridor.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Little Mountain without a reason?

No, you need a legal reason. For non-payment, you use the 5-day notice. For other lease violations, or to end a month-to-month tenancy, you'd use a 30-day notice. South Carolina does not have statewide "just cause" eviction requirements, meaning you have more flexibility than in some states, but you still need to follow proper notice procedures.

Q2

What if my tenant pays after the 5-day notice but before I file?

If the tenant pays all rent and late fees within the 5-day notice period, you must accept it and the tenancy continues. If they pay after the 5-day period but before you file in court, you have the option to accept it or proceed with filing. Accepting partial payment *after* the notice period can sometimes complicate your case, so consult an attorney if unsure.

Q3

How long does the whole eviction process typically take in Little Mountain?

The typical eviction timeline in Little Mountain is around 38 days from the initial notice to the final lockout. This is an average; specific cases can be shorter or longer depending on court schedules, tenant actions, and any complications.

Q4

Is there rent control in Little Mountain, SC?

No, South Carolina has no statewide rent control laws. This means you are generally free to set market rates for your rental units. However, always check for any local ordinances, though they are rare in smaller towns like Little Mountain. For more information, see our South Carolina rent control rules.

Q5

What are common mistakes landlords make during an eviction?

Common mistakes include improper notice serving, accepting partial rent after the notice period (which can reset the process), failing to have a solid lease, and attempting illegal "self-help" evictions. Always follow the letter of the law and consider legal counsel to avoid these pitfalls.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.3/10 places Little Mountain in the 36th percentile of South Carolina cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.