Cadence Eviction Risk: Lower , Mesa

Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. 27% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Running cool, economic stress reads 1/10. On the high side, court filing pressure reads 8.9/10. The voucher gap is 27.0%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

Against Maricopa County at 46.0%, 40% of renters here are cost-burdened. SNAP participation runs 5.1% against 15.2% nationally. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 3 filings here across 2 tracked years.

Housing insecurity runs 6.9% against 14.2% nationally. Against the Maricopa County average of 3.7, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.7 points.

The worst year on record was 2005, when 2.6% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 3.1% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.