Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #56,048 of 84,120 nationally

Picture Rocks Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 04019004425 · Pima, AZ · pop 5,479 · 68% of tract blocks fall in Picture Rocks

Tract 04019004425 sits in Picture Rocks, AZ, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3.6/10. Population here is 5,479. 38% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 2% Owners 93%
Tract context
Occupied units2,425
Renter share6.7%
SVI overall0.40
Poverty rate15.5%
Median income$64,360

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Picture Rocks
Very Low
Within county
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#135 of 270 tracts In Pima
Moderate
Within state
54 th percentile
Rank, 54th percentileLowHigh
#811 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
Moderate
National
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#56,048 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Picture Rocks and the region

Centroid at 32.3829, -111.4551 · click any tract to drill in

Why Picture Rocks scores 3.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Picture Rocks
6.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
15.5% poverty · this tract
3.9
Supply constraint
$1,552 rent vs county FMR
6.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Picture Rocks
4.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Picture Rocks
2.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Picture Rocks
5.9

How Picture Rocks compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Picture Rocks risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.63.6This tracttract 004425Picture Rocks: 3.23.2Picture Rocksparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 40

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 158Total filings over 12 yrs
  • 5.10%Avg annual filing rate
  • 9.4%Peak (2005)
  • 8Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 040190044252004: 14 filings (4.27/100 renter HHs)2005: 19 filings (9.36/100 renter HHs)2006: 19 filings (9.36/100 renter HHs)2007: 12 filings (5.91/100 renter HHs)2008: 16 filings (7.88/100 renter HHs)2009: 10 filings (4.93/100 renter HHs)2010: 7 filings (1.81/100 renter HHs)2011: 15 filings (4.27/100 renter HHs)2012: 18 filings (5.13/100 renter HHs)2013: 12 filings (3.42/100 renter HHs)2016: 8 filings (2.43/100 renter HHs)2017: 8 filings (2.43/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 43% over the past 12 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Picture Rocks

Against Pima County at 43.8%, 67% of renters here are cost-burdened. Average gross rent is $1,552, 62% above the Picture Rocks average.

The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 8.4/10. Running cool, state political climate reads 2.2/10. On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 2.5/10.

The filing record is not thin: 158 evictions over 12 years of observation. The voucher gap is 13.0%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

The worst year on record was 2005, when 9.4% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 5.1% of renter households face a filing.

On the national scale it lands near the 33rd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Only 7% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.6/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 04019004425

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04019004425?

Census tract 04019004425 in Picture Rocks scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 04019004425?

Median gross rent is $1,552/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 67% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 04019004425?

15.5% of residents in tract 04019004425 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,479.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 04019004425?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 40th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 39th, household 50th, minority 40th, housing 39th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04019004425?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 158 eviction filings across 12 validated years in tract 04019004425 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.10% of renter households, peaking at 9.4% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 04019004425 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 04019004425 compare to Picture Rocks overall?

Tract 04019004425 scores 3.6/10, higher than the parent city of Picture Rocks at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Picture Rocks; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Picture Rocks

Top eight tracts in Picture Rocks ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related