Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #56,048 of 84,120 nationally

Tucson Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 04019004042 · Pima, AZ · pop 5,443

With a score of 3.6/10, tract 04019004042 in Tucson, AZ reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 5,443. Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1.5/10.

Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 22% Stable renters 23% Owners 55%
Tract context
Occupied units2,626
Renter share44.5%
SVI overall0.37
Poverty rate11.1%
Median income$70,788

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#108 of 143 tracts In Tucson
Low
Within county
51 th percentile
Rank, 51st percentileLowHigh
#133 of 270 tracts In Pima
Moderate
Within state
54 th percentile
Rank, 54th percentileLowHigh
#811 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
Moderate
National
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#56,048 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tucson and the region

Centroid at 32.2281, -110.7812 · click any tract to drill in

Why Tucson scores 3.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tucson
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
11.1% poverty · this tract
2.8
Supply constraint
$1,294 rent vs county FMR
4.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tucson
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tucson
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tucson
4.5

How Tucson compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Tucson risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.63.6This tracttract 004042Tucson: 3.83.8Tucsonparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 37

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 743Total filings over 12 yrs
  • 6.79%Avg annual filing rate
  • 13.6%Peak (2004)
  • 59Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 040190040422004: 82 filings (13.60/100 renter HHs)2005: 60 filings (6.24/100 renter HHs)2006: 48 filings (4.99/100 renter HHs)2007: 44 filings (4.57/100 renter HHs)2008: 60 filings (6.24/100 renter HHs)2009: 46 filings (4.78/100 renter HHs)2010: 57 filings (6.08/100 renter HHs)2011: 80 filings (8.57/100 renter HHs)2012: 66 filings (7.07/100 renter HHs)2013: 77 filings (8.25/100 renter HHs)2016: 64 filings (5.76/100 renter HHs)2017: 59 filings (5.31/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 28% over the past 12 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Tucson

Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 8.4/10. Severe burden reaches 16%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 2.2/10.

about half of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, above the Pima County average of 43.8%. Court records carry 743 eviction filings across 12 observed years. SNAP participation runs 7.4% against 15.2% nationally.

Food insecurity runs 10.1% against 17.8% nationally. Average gross rent is $1,294, 13% above the Tucson average.

The worst year on record was 2004, when 13.6% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 6.8% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 33rd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.3/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 04019004042

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04019004042?

Census tract 04019004042 in Tucson scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 04019004042?

Median gross rent is $1,294/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 04019004042?

11.1% of residents in tract 04019004042 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,443.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 04019004042?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 37th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 35th, household 22th, minority 51th, housing 53th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04019004042?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 743 eviction filings across 12 validated years in tract 04019004042 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.79% of renter households, peaking at 13.6% in 2004. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 04019004042 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 04019004042 compare to Tucson overall?

Tract 04019004042 scores 3.6/10, right in line with the parent city of Tucson at 3.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tucson eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tucson

Top eight tracts in Tucson ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related