Tanuri Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Catalina Foothills
Tract 04019004721 · Pima, AZ · pop 3,920 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
04019004721 is a census tract in the Tanuri Hills area of Catalina Foothills, AZ. It scores 3/10 for landlords. Cost burden runs roughly one in three here against 43.8% across Pima County.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Catalina Foothills and the region
Centroid at 32.2769, -110.8607 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tanuri Hills scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Tanuri Hills compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 43
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 20%Socioeconomic
- 11%Household composition
- 53%Racial/ethnic minority
- 94%Housing & transportation
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 561Total filings over 12 yrs
- 5.84%Avg annual filing rate
- 9.1%Peak (2007)
- 64Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Tanuri Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.5%Housing insecurity
- 4.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.9%Food insecurity
- 5.5%SNAP enrollment
- 5.5%Transit barriers
- 7.0%No health insurance
- 14.0%Frequent mental distress
- 29.2%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Tanuri Hills
The dominant input is court filing pressure at 8.4/10. Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.7/10. Severe burden reaches 15%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 2.2/10. Average gross rent is $1,125, 20% below the Catalina Foothills average. Food insecurity runs 7.9% against 17.8% nationally.
It sits 0.9 points below the Pima County average of 3.9. The filing record is not thin: 561 evictions over 12 years of observation. Housing insecurity runs 6.5% against 14.2% nationally.
The worst year on record was 2007, when 9.1% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 5.8% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Social vulnerability reads 4.9/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Rent consumes only 16% of average household income of $86,326, an unusually wide affordability cushion.
Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 04019004721
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04019004721?
What is the average rent in tract 04019004721?
What is the poverty rate in tract 04019004721?
How socially vulnerable is tract 04019004721?
Is tract 04019004721 considered part of Tanuri Hills?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04019004721?
What share of households in tract 04019004721 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 04019004721 compare to Catalina Foothills overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Catalina Foothills
Top eight tracts in Catalina Foothills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.