Within parent city
13
th percentile
Very Low
Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Catalina Foothills Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 04019004079 · Pima, AZ · pop 2,511
Census tract 04019004079 covers part of Catalina Foothills, AZ, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,511. 31% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21%
Stable renters 18%
Owners 61%
Tract context
Occupied units1,300
Renter share38.6%
SVI overall0.45
Poverty rate7.5%
Median income$109,298
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
0
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
40
th percentile
Low
National
20
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Catalina Foothills and the region
Centroid at 32.2941, -110.8190 · click any tract to drill in
Why Catalina Foothills scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
7.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
7.5% poverty · this tract
1.9
Supply constraint
$1,527 rent vs county FMR
6.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
4.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
3.5
How Catalina Foothills compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 45
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 31%Socioeconomic
- 60%Household composition
- 32%Racial/ethnic minority
- 61%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.0%Housing insecurity
- 4.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.1%Food insecurity
- 4.8%SNAP enrollment
- 5.0%Transit barriers
- 6.0%No health insurance
- 13.6%Frequent mental distress
- 27.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Catalina Foothills
The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 8.4/10. Against Pima County at 43.8%, 54% of renters here are cost-burdened. On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.7/10.
Running cool, economic stress reads 1.9/10. Food insecurity runs 7.1% against 17.8% nationally.
SNAP participation runs 4.8% against 15.2% nationally. It sits 0.9 points below the Pima County average of 3.9.
Average gross rent is $1,527, 8% above the Catalina Foothills average. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
Social vulnerability reads 5.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Against average income of $109,298, annual rent is just 17%.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 04019004079
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04019004079?
Census tract 04019004079 in Catalina Foothills scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 04019004079?
Median gross rent is $1,527/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 04019004079?
7.5% of residents in tract 04019004079 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,511.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 04019004079?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 45th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 31th, household 60th, minority 32th, housing 61th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 04019004079 struggle to pay rent?
About 6.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 04019004079 compare to Catalina Foothills overall?
Tract 04019004079 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Catalina Foothills at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Catalina Foothills eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Catalina Foothills
Top eight tracts in Catalina Foothills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · AZ
Catalina Foothills
3
/ 10 · Low
Tract · AZ
Westward Look Heights
3
/ 10 · Low
Tract · AZ
Shadow Hills
3
/ 10 · Low
Tract · AZ
04019004717
3
/ 10 · Low
Tract · AZ
Tierra Serena
3
/ 10 · Low
Tract · AZ
Tierra Serena
3
/ 10 · Low
Tract · AZ
Tanuri Hills
3
/ 10 · Low
Tract · AZ
Tanuri Hills
3
/ 10 · Low
Related