Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Catalina Foothills Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 04019004717 · Pima, AZ · pop 1,993

Census tract 04019004717 covers part of Catalina Foothills, AZ, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 1,993 residents. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 8.4/10.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 19% Owners 71%
Tract context
Occupied units1,088
Renter share28.5%
SVI overall0.15
Poverty rate7.0%
Median income$155,833

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
81 th percentile
Rank, 81st percentileLowHigh
#4 of 17 tracts In Catalina Foothills
High
Within county
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#202 of 270 tracts In Pima
Low
Within state
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#1,065 of 1,765 tracts In Arizona
Low
National
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#67,219 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Catalina Foothills and the region

Centroid at 32.3302, -110.8926 · click any tract to drill in

Why Catalina Foothills scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
7.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
7.0% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$1,357 rent vs county FMR
4.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
4.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Catalina Foothills
3.5

How Catalina Foothills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Catalina Foothills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 004717Catalina Foothills: 3.43.4Catalina Foothillsparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 15

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 142Total filings over 12 yrs
  • 4.29%Avg annual filing rate
  • 9.0%Peak (2010)
  • 8Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 040190047172004: 9 filings (3.57/100 renter HHs)2005: 8 filings (2.40/100 renter HHs)2006: 14 filings (4.20/100 renter HHs)2007: 5 filings (1.50/100 renter HHs)2008: 4 filings (1.20/100 renter HHs)2009: 16 filings (4.80/100 renter HHs)2010: 23 filings (9.02/100 renter HHs)2011: 6 filings (2.22/100 renter HHs)2012: 13 filings (4.81/100 renter HHs)2013: 23 filings (8.52/100 renter HHs)2016: 13 filings (5.70/100 renter HHs)2017: 8 filings (3.51/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 12 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Catalina Foothills

Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.7/10. Cost burden runs roughly one in three here against 43.8% across Pima County.

Running cool, economic stress reads 1.7/10. Food insecurity runs 5.8% against 17.8% nationally.

14% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Housing insecurity runs 4.6% against 14.2% nationally.

It sits 0.9 points below the Pima County average of 3.9. The filing record is not thin: 142 evictions over 12 years of observation. Filings peaked in 2010 at 9.0% of renter households.

In a typical year about 4.3% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.4/10.

Rent consumes only 10% of average household income of $155,833, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 04019004717

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04019004717?

Census tract 04019004717 in Catalina Foothills scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 04019004717?

Median gross rent is $1,357/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 04019004717?

7.0% of residents in tract 04019004717 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,993.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 04019004717?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 15th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 11th, household 25th, minority 24th, housing 34th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 04019004717?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 142 eviction filings across 12 validated years in tract 04019004717 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.29% of renter households, peaking at 9.0% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 04019004717 struggle to pay rent?

About 4.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 04019004717 compare to Catalina Foothills overall?

Tract 04019004717 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Catalina Foothills at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Catalina Foothills eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Catalina Foothills

Top eight tracts in Catalina Foothills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related