Neighborhood · Ranked #26,446 of 84,120 nationally

The Foothills Eviction Risk: Moderate , Fortuna Foothills

Tract 04027011122 · Yuma, AZ · pop 1,602 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

In The Foothills in Fortuna Foothills, census tract 04027011122 scores 5.4/10 for eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #37,984 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 75% of renter households, a severe level, and 67% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,094 a month while the average household earns $28,731 a year, roughly 46% of income at the averages. Renters make up 39% of occupied homes.

Risk score

4.9

Moderate

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 29% Stable renters 10% Owners 61%

Tract context

Occupied units1,027

Renter share39.3%

SVI overall0.75

Poverty rate22.2%

Median income$28,731

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Fortuna Foothills and the region

Centroid at 32.6634, -114.4148 · click any tract to drill in

Why The Foothills scores 4.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Fortuna Foothills

5.2

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

4.7

State political climate

Arizona legislature & governorship

2.2

Economic stress

22.2% poverty · this tract

5.6

Supply constraint

$1,094 rent vs county FMR

2.9

Rent control risk

Inherited from Fortuna Foothills

8.1

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

2.4

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Fortuna Foothills

4.2

Housing court bias

Inherited from Fortuna Foothills

7.0

How The Foothills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 75

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

92%Socioeconomic
61%Household composition
47%Racial/ethnic minority
45%Housing & transportation

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

14.9%Housing insecurity
11.3%Utility-shutoff threat
24.7%Food insecurity
24.7%SNAP enrollment
12.0%Transit barriers
16.9%No health insurance
15.5%Frequent mental distress
47.3%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in The Foothills

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 8.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Fortuna Foothills eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Yuma County average of 4.3 and above the Arizona statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 75th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

In CDC survey modeling, about 14.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 11.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 04027011122

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04027011122?

Census tract 04027011122 in the The Foothills neighborhood scores 4.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 04027011122?

Median gross rent is $1,094/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 75% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 04027011122?

22.2% of residents in tract 04027011122 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,602.

How socially vulnerable is tract 04027011122?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 75th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 92th, household 61th, minority 47th, housing 45th.

Is tract 04027011122 considered part of The Foothills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 04027011122 fall within The Foothills (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 04027011122 struggle to pay rent?

About 14.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 04027011122 compare to Fortuna Foothills overall?

Tract 04027011122 scores 4.9/10, higher than the parent city of Fortuna Foothills at 3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fortuna Foothills eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Fortuna Foothills

Top eight tracts in Fortuna Foothills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.