Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #6,848 of 84,120 nationally

Elm-Erstan-Baker Eviction Risk: Elevated , Fayetteville

Tract 05143010703 · Washington County, AR · pop 3,086 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

Census tract 05143010703 runs through the Elm-Erstan-Baker neighborhood of Fayetteville. With 3,086 residents, it scores 5.2/10 for landlords. That is riskier than about 47% of US census tracts.

About 55% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 27% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $842 a month against an average household income of $30,842 a year, roughly 33% of income at the averages. Renters make up 96% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
6.6
Elevated
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 52% Stable renters 43% Owners 5%
Tract context
Occupied units1,592
Renter share95.7%
SVI overall0.77
Poverty rate38.3%
Median income$30,842

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Elm-Erstan-Baker
Very High
Within parent city
79 th percentile
Rank, 79th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 25 tracts In Fayetteville
High
Within county
91 th percentile
Rank, 91st percentileLowHigh
#6 of 54 tracts In Washington County
Very High
Within state
98 th percentile
Rank, 98th percentileLowHigh
#20 of 823 tracts In Arkansas
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Fayetteville and the region

Centroid at 36.0968, -94.1689 · click any tract to drill in

Why Elm-Erstan-Baker scores 6.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fayetteville
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.8
State political climate
Arkansas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
38.3% poverty · this tract
9.6
Supply constraint
$842 rent vs county FMR
2.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fayetteville
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fayetteville
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fayetteville
2.5

How Elm-Erstan-Baker compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Elm-Erstan-Baker risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.66.6This tracttract 010703Fayetteville: 2.32.3Fayettevilleparent cityCounty: 4.54.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.74.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 77

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Elm-Erstan-Baker. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Elm-Erstan-Baker

What moves this score most is economic stress at 9.6/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Fayetteville eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Washington County average of 4.0 and above the Arkansas statewide average of 4.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is racially mixed and ranks around the 77th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

In CDC survey modeling, about 21.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 17.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 05143010703

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 05143010703?

Census tract 05143010703 in the Elm-Erstan-Baker neighborhood scores 6.6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 05143010703?

Median gross rent is $842/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 55% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 05143010703?

38.3% of residents in tract 05143010703 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,086.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 05143010703?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 77th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 69th, household 58th, minority 66th, housing 83th.
Q5

Is tract 05143010703 considered part of Elm-Erstan-Baker?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 05143010703 fall within Elm-Erstan-Baker (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 05143010703 struggle to pay rent?

About 21.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 17.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 05143010703 compare to Fayetteville overall?

Tract 05143010703 scores 6.6/10, higher than the parent city of Fayetteville at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fayetteville eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Fayetteville

Top eight tracts in Fayetteville ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related