Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #19,562 of 84,120 nationally

Decoto Eviction Risk: Moderate , Union City

Tract 06001440308 · Alameda, CA · pop 6,011 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Landlord eviction risk in census tract 06001440308 (Decoto in Union City, California) comes in at 5.5/10, the Moderate tier. On the national scale it ranks #34,797 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 43% of renter households, a severe level, and 22% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,374 a month while the average household earns $113,750 a year, roughly 25% of income at the averages. About 55% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 24% Stable renters 31% Owners 45%
Tract context
Occupied units1,987
Renter share54.8%
SVI overall0.77
Poverty rate13.8%
Median income$113,750

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 7 tracts In Decoto
Very High
Within parent city
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#2 of 16 tracts In Union City
Very High
Within county
53 th percentile
Rank, 53rd percentileLowHigh
#178 of 378 tracts In Alameda
Moderate
Within state
47 th percentile
Rank, 47th percentileLowHigh
#4,867 of 9,109 tracts In California
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Union City and the region

Centroid at 37.5893, -122.0278 · click any tract to drill in

Why Decoto scores 5.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Union City
8.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
13.8% poverty · this tract
3.5
Supply constraint
$2,374 rent vs county FMR
3.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Union City
5.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Union City
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Union City
5.6

How Decoto compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Decoto risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.45.4This tracttract 440308Union City: 8.18.1Union Cityparent cityCounty: 5.15.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 77

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Decoto. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Decoto

The heaviest input here is eviction process difficulty at 6.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Union City, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Alameda County average of 5.8 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is Asian and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 77th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

In CDC survey modeling, about 12.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06001440308

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06001440308?

Census tract 06001440308 in the Decoto neighborhood scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06001440308?

Median gross rent is $2,374/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06001440308?

13.8% of residents in tract 06001440308 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,011.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06001440308?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 77th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 40th, household 78th, minority 89th, housing 93th.
Q5

Is tract 06001440308 considered part of Decoto?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06001440308 fall within Decoto (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06001440308 struggle to pay rent?

About 12.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06001440308 compare to Union City overall?

Tract 06001440308 scores 5.4/10, lower than the parent city of Union City at 8.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Union City; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Union City

Top eight tracts in Union City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related