Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #3,082 of 84,120 nationally

Silver Triangle Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037143602 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,734 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

With a score of 9.3/10, tract 06037143602 in the Silver Triangle area of Los Angeles, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score
9.3
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 32% Stable renters 26% Owners 42%
Tract context
Occupied units2,337
Renter share58.6%
SVI overall0.55
Poverty rate12.8%
Median income$105,542

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 8 tracts In Silver Triangle
Very High
Within parent city
34 th percentile
Rank, 34th percentileLowHigh
#739 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
Low
Within county
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#928 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Elevated
Within state
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#1,347 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.1450, -118.3855 · click any tract to drill in

Why Silver Triangle scores 9.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
12.8% poverty · this tract
3.2
Supply constraint
$1,862 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Silver Triangle compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Silver Triangle risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.39.3This tracttract 143602Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 55

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Silver Triangle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Silver Triangle

Running hot, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. 21% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Food insecurity runs 8.8% against 17.8% nationally. Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.9 points. Adults with no health insurance runs 4.0% against 11.3% nationally.

This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. Nationally it ranks #3,082 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Social vulnerability reads 6/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.8 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037143602

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037143602?

Census tract 06037143602 in the Silver Triangle neighborhood scores 9.3/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037143602?

Median gross rent is $1,862/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 55% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037143602?

12.8% of residents in tract 06037143602 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,734.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037143602?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 55th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 56th, household 12th, minority 47th, housing 84th.
Q5

Is tract 06037143602 considered part of Silver Triangle?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037143602 fall within Silver Triangle (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037143602 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037143602 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037143602 scores 9.3/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037143602 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related