Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #2,922 of 84,120 nationally

Carthay Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037216301 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 1,439 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

06037216301 is a census tract in the Carthay area of Los Angeles, CA. It scores 9.4/10 for landlords. It is home to 1,439 residents. 38% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
9.4
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 23% Stable renters 11% Owners 66%
Tract context
Occupied units631
Renter share33.3%
SVI overall0.14
Poverty rate10.5%
Median income$97,282

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 4 tracts In Carthay
Elevated
Within parent city
36 th percentile
Rank, 36th percentileLowHigh
#720 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
Low
Within county
64 th percentile
Rank, 64th percentileLowHigh
#894 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Elevated
Within state
86 th percentile
Rank, 86th percentileLowHigh
#1,290 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.0611, -118.3681 · click any tract to drill in

Why Carthay scores 9.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
10.5% poverty · this tract
2.6
Supply constraint
$3,036 rent vs county FMR
6.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Carthay compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Carthay risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.49.4This tracttract 216301Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 14

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Carthay. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Carthay

The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. At $3,036 a month, rents run 57% over what the rest of Los Angeles commands.

Running hot, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 68% of renters here are cost-burdened.

On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. Set annual rent against average income of $97,282 and the ratio lands at 37%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.

It sits 1.0 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. The voucher gap is 15.7%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. SNAP participation runs 6.7% against 15.2% nationally.

Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.7% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037216301

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037216301?

Census tract 06037216301 in the Carthay neighborhood scores 9.4/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037216301?

Median gross rent is $3,036/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 68% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037216301?

10.5% of residents in tract 06037216301 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,439.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037216301?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 14th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 21th, household 30th, minority 42th, housing 10th.
Q5

Is tract 06037216301 considered part of Carthay?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037216301 fall within Carthay (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037216301 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037216301 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037216301 scores 9.4/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037216301 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related