Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #29,336 of 84,120 nationally

Temple City Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 06037432101 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,813 · 96% of tract blocks fall in Temple City

Tract 06037432101 sits in Temple City, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.2/10. Population here is 4,813. Cost burden runs 26% here against 53.8% across Los Angeles County.

Risk score
5.2
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 15% Owners 80%
Tract context
Occupied units1,390
Renter share19.9%
SVI overall0.47
Poverty rate6.5%
Median income$130,142

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
13 th percentile
Rank, 13th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 9 tracts In Temple City
Very Low
Within county
2 th percentile
Rank, 2nd percentileLowHigh
#2,447 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Very Low
Within state
9 th percentile
Rank, 9th percentileLowHigh
#8,324 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very Low
National
65 th percentile
Rank, 65th percentileLowHigh
#29,336 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Temple City and the region

Centroid at 34.0959, -118.0429 · click any tract to drill in

Why Temple City scores 5.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Temple City
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
6.5% poverty · this tract
1.6
Supply constraint
$2,754 rent vs county FMR
5.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Temple City
5.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Temple City
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Temple City
5.7

How Temple City compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Temple City risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.25.2This tracttract 432101Temple City: 6.66.6Temple Cityparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 47

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Temple City

Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads safer for landlords by 3.2 points. Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1.6/10.

At $2,754 a month, rents run 29% over what the rest of Temple City commands. Running hot, local political climate reads 7.5/10. 12% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

On the high side, regional political climate reads 7.2/10. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.9% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

That is riskier than roughly 65% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 20% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.3/10.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.3 points cooler. Annual rent works out to 25% of average household income of $130,142.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037432101

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037432101?

Census tract 06037432101 in Temple City scores 5.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037432101?

Median gross rent is $2,754/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 26% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037432101?

6.5% of residents in tract 06037432101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,813.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037432101?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 47th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 31th, household 60th, minority 90th, housing 41th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 06037432101 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 06037432101 compare to Temple City overall?

Tract 06037432101 scores 5.2/10, lower than the parent city of Temple City at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Temple City; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7

Was tract 06037432101 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Temple City

Top eight tracts in Temple City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related